
2xlp wrote:the blonding shouldn't have anything to do with temp
the sourness on the first sip could be from beans that are too fresh giving a green-tasting crema
how old is the machine? do you have hard water? is it possible that scale buildup is giving you bad heat-transfer in the hx tube ?

dawgcatching wrote:My machine is a Fiorenzatio Bricoletta. I was able to borrow a Fluke multimeter/thermometer recently, and noticed that, while my temperature flush was nice and consistent (a 2-second flush past boiling, 20 second rebound time resulted in a 201 to 201.5 brewing temp every time), I had problems with temperature stability during the course of the shot. After 17 seconds, my temperature inside the puck started to drop off pretty rapidly, decreasing about 1 degree F every 1.5 seconds.
Would a PID solve this problem? Or, am I looking at something else to rectify my lack of temperature stability? It may just be too small of a machine to be temperature stable though a 25-second shot.
HB wrote:The prior chart only showed thermofilter readings. Below is an example of the two location readings shown together. To demonstrate the attenuating effect of the group, the adapter reading was taken from the bottom of the well (nearer the HX exit), not turn "D" as Eric's instructions suggest.
Temperature within the valve chamber exit (blue) versus thermofilter (red)
HB wrote:Although we speak as if all HX machines are operated similarly, it simply isn't true.
I haven't disassembled these HXs to measure, but if I were to guess, the key difference between these various E61 incarnations with regards to flush regime and temperature profile would be the HX length / immersion, HX volume, and most importantly the injector length. This controls the mixing that occurs in all HXs.
edwa wrote:Prior to installing the adapter my procedure was to flush 7 oz.s from a long idle, build my PF and then flush 3 oz and pull. The next shot only got a 3 oz flush. This came from some feedback I had gotten here and are actually based on a countdown from end of dance.
After I installed the adapter the first discovery was how hot these shots were. More than ever before I feel like I am truly surfing a temperature wave as its never the same. Including back to back shots, though I haven't gone more than 4 in a row. I have to be careful not to end the flush too soon otherwise the temperature never drops far enough. If I pull above 210 the temp doesn't drop far enough and I get a hot shot. With this in mind I have been watching the falling readout trying to gauge when to lock and pull rather than count from the end of the dance.
Perhaps this is the wrong approach?
edwa wrote:I've been told that the Fuji controller has a fast response but I wonder if anyone know's how much difference there is between it and the Fluke or even Omega?
edwa wrote:I have to ask the obvious. Would the temp stability increase if insulation were added around the boiler?
Here, I hope are 2 videos showing my temp. decreases during a pull. I'm using 6 day old West Coast Roasting Toro DeCaf. My heat cycle is from 0.91 to 1.1. These shots were made with the temperature read-out in mind so forgive me for the early blonding you will see.
Assuming these went through google's verification you should see some clips.The first clip is of a shot pulled from a long idle of more than an hour. This is without any pre-flush. Basically, I walked up, ground my beans letting the PF stay warm in the group as long as possible. Built my PF, then flush and go.
The second clip is of the following shot after rinse, wiggle, grind and build.
dawgcatching, how do these temperature decreases compare to yours?
Ed
P.S. On a humorous note, you can see a reflection of the TV news that's on a big screen 38 ft away in the chrome of the drip tray.
edwa wrote:I've been told that the Fuji controller has a fast response but I wonder if anyone know's how much difference there is between it and the Fluke or even Omega?
erics wrote:So, this nice machine may require a little more time in the lab than normal.