www.counterculturecoffee.com: coffee driven people, people driven coffee

La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look - Page 2

Grinders are one of the keys to exceptional espresso. Discuss them here.

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by jesawdy on Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:47 pm

zix wrote:I am curious to know, jesawdy: how are you doing with the Max? Getting to grips with the doser yet? Do lots of grinds get stuck in the chute or is it about the same as with the Junior?

I haven't spent much time with Max the last two weeks. But a few comments...

Doser Vanes
My Junior doser sweeps a bit better. I haven't done anything to the Max to address this yet.... it might just be that something isn't together just so, and really, it is a minimal amount of coffee left in the doser. If needed, the tape mod should address it no problem.

Grinder Chute
Yes, like every dosered grinder out there (and most doserless as well) right now, grinds are retained in the chute. I have taken a less fanatical approach to this issue on all my grinders (and likely none too popular approach for the more OCD folks). On the Rocky doserless, I just grind a very small amount into a waste container. If it was within the last 30 minutes or so, I don't bother to do that. On the Junior and Max, if it has set a long spell, a quick on/off and sweep of the doser to the waste tray. I do not sweep out the grinder chute unless I am cleaning the grinder. For the most part, grinds seem to accumulate around the perimeter of the chute, and the fresh coffee kinda tunnels through the center. IMHO, the stuff stuck there, more or less stays there, and if I were to sweep it out everytime, I have just wasted my time, and potentially just as much coffee fiddling with cleaning the grinder chute.

Now, my mornings involve getting myself and two small children (1 y.o. and 4 y.o.) ready for the day by myself. In the span of 20 minutes, I may have gotten dressed myself, changed a diaper, dressed my daughter, woken my son, read the HB forums, pulled a double, woken my son again, made an Americano, packed a lunch, woken my son for the third time, ad nauseum. I'm not interested in adding steps to my espresso making process if I can help it.

I hope to spend some time next week doing a Junior/Max side-by-side comparison and should have more to add then.
Jeff Sawdy
User avatar
jesawdy
 
Posts: 1592
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Black Mtn, NC

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by zix on Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:53 pm

A very impressive morning routine, jeff! Can't say I manage to do all that in 20 minutes, am far too dizzy and unstructured. But I do see your point, being a father of three myself, and have taken much the same approach with the minimoka grinder when I had that. As long as there isn't too much of it, and it is easy to clean out, I guess that is OK.
Thanks for the details, looking forward to your findings.
LMWDP #047
User avatar
zix
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Sep 07, 2006
Location: Sweden
www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you
www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by diab0lus on Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:01 am

jesawdy wrote:I haven't spent much time with Max the last two weeks. But a few comments...


I'm interested to hear if you have any more comments regarding this grinder. Specifically, I am currently also considering the Macap MXK, Casadio Instantaneo and the Compak K10. If you have experience with any of those, comparisons or general comments would be much appreciated. Theoretically, should I expect a better grind from a combination burr set when compared to a conical burr set? I have a feeling that the answer isn't a definite yes or no.

Thanks,
-Ryan
User avatar
diab0lus
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mar 12, 2007
Location: Lititz, PA

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by Ken Fox on Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:56 am

I haven't weighed in on this thread, but have had some back channel contacts with Jeff about his grinder.

I now own two new Maxs, which were obtained about 10 days ago. I also have two Junior grinders, which have joined their first cousin, a Cimbali Cadet, down in the basement. My experience with the Cadet grinder goes back about 11 or 12 years, to the beginnings of my own personal espresso journey, when I used to use Lavazza Super Crema, in my (at that time) unmodified pourover vibe Junior espresso machine, which in modified form still has an honored place on my kitchen island counter. But I digress . . . .

There is a lot of information previously posted in this thread which is accurate and to which I have little to add. The Max grinder has both a conical burr set, which "never" needs replacing, and a 64mm planar burr set, which is easily replaceable. The planar burrs are not the same as the old 68mm planar burrs found in the old DRM conical-planar set. Given that this grinder has a conical burr set that the beans are exposed to before they even get to the planar burrs, this planar burr set would probably last AT LEAST ten years in home or other low volume settings. My friend Angelo, Michael Teahan's partner in LA, told me that I should plan on replacing the conical burrs in approximately . . . . two hundred years.

Let me address the differences which I perceive in the Max grinder vs. the Cimbali Junior (and Cadet) grinders. The form factors are similar and differ mainly by the height, which is greater in the Max (and not much different than the older Cadet). This is due primarily to a larger hopper, and to a very small extent by the added height needed to accommodate the conical and the planar burrs in the Max as opposed to just the planar burrs in the Junior. The small Junior style hopper can apparently be bought as a special order item and with removal of 3 screws could be swapped for the stock hopper resulting in a grinder not much taller than the Junior. I personally think that most people worry too much about under counter clearances and should just rearrange their entire kitchens, to accommodate their espresso fetishes, as I have done. This may not go over too well with those married individuals among us, however :P

The doser on the Junior and on the Max is identical, although the doser lever is different, and it all works similarly. My own observation is that the doser of my Max grinders is just as efficient in sweeping out grinds as are the dosers in my Junior grinders. The speed of the Max is about half or a little faster than that, compared to the junior. In home usage this is of no importance. The Max is an autofill grinder, but you can use the power switch as an on-off switch, which is how any reasonable home user, wanting to grind per shot, would use it. It takes a little getting used to but after a week I found that it was no harder to use in grinding per shot, than were the Juniors, and I am not wasting any more coffee than I was with the Juniors (at first, the wastage was about 20% more, but after the learning curve this has disappeared and in fact with the slower grind speed I might start wasting even less coffee than before).

Adjustments are basically the same as with the Junior although the adjustment knob is on the right side as you face the grinder rather than on the front; no biggie, again, it is just something else to get used to.

OK, now that I've used the two new grinders for a week and a half, what do I think of them? The simple answer is that I like them a lot. First, the build quality is 100% classic Cimbali, which is to say they are built like tanks; few commercially made products are still made to this standard and fortunately, Cimbali has not lowered their standards to cut costs. As to grind quality and the shots that result, I have to be more subjective. I have not done any side by side comparisons nor done any other sort of critical testing. With these caveats I have to say that the overall "quality" of my shots seems to have improved. It is like I had a range before, which I'll arbitrarily call from 85-94 on my own 100 point scale. For reference, I have used these grinders for 3 different single origins, to date, for Brazil Yellow Bourbon, Costa Rica Santa Sofia, and Yirgacheffe Adado, all three bought in green from Paradise Roasters and home roasted on my modified sample roaster. I have not yet tried these grinders with any blends or other SOs.

Now, the range (with the Max grinders) appears to be moved upwards and is foreshortened, say to 89-96. I haven't had a lot of sink shots (percentage-wise) in the last year or two, but I seem to have even less than before. And, there seems to be a little bit more "flexibility" when it comes to the grind, that I can miss the grind due to such things as changes in humidity and in the beans themselves, but it matters less, nailing the grind spot on seems to be less important and whatever the volume (within reason) that the shot has, it is good.

Others have reported that their conical grinder produced shots are "brighter" than their former planar grinder made shots. I have not had this observation, but I would say that the shots are "rounder," that they have less sharp edges to them. I wish I could explain what I meant by that but it completely escapes me.

How do you compare this Max grinder to the straight conicals out there? I have no experience with straight conicals but people I respect who do, tell me that most of the bigger ones are made for cafe volume reasons rather than perceived grind quality reasons. I personally doubt that in a head to head blind tasting that the Max would produce grinds deemed less desireable than those from a straight conical.

As is, this is a great grinder. If Cimbali made this in a slightly smaller version with the smaller hopper and eliminated the autogrind function, this would absolutely blow the conical competition out of the water at anything like the price it would sell for.

ken

EDIT: I have removed former references to 68mm planar burrs which were in this post originally and proved to be innacurate.
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 1063
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by diab0lus on Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:02 am

:o Great reply. Thanks for taking the time to contribute to this thread.

Ken Fox wrote:Others have reported that their conical grinder produced shots are "brighter" than their former planar grinder made shots. I have not had this observation, but I would say that the shots are "rounder," that they have less sharp edges to them. I wish I could explain what I meant by that but it completely escapes me.


"Rounder" like a preinfused shot versus a non-preinfused shot? More pleasing tastes with less harshness?

Ken Fox wrote:How do you compare this Max grinder to the straight conicals out there? I have no experience with straight conicals but people I respect who do, tell me that most of the bigger ones are made for cafe volume reasons rather than perceived grind quality reasons. I personally doubt that in a head to head blind tasting that the Max would produce grinds deemed less desireable than those from a straight conical.


Interesting point wrt conical only grinders. I assumed that conical grinders produced superior grind quality when compared to planar grinders (with the exception of those cheap-o conicals), but I've never had a shot from a conical or a combination grinder to compare. Jeff stated previously that the Max cannot overall be compared to the M3 - I agree. They are obviously very different when looking at the dozer, hopper and sweeper (or lack thereof), but I think that a similarity in grind quality, not necessarily distribution, might exist between the M3 and the Max. If that is true, then I would not be far from deciding that the Max will be the last grinder I buy. I don't mind the size, I'll just cut down the hopper or convince my wife to let me hack the lip off of one of our cabinets. :)

Do you know of any other grinders less than 4 feet tall and 150 lb. that uses 120v and conical and planar burr sets?

Thanks,
-Ryan
User avatar
diab0lus
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mar 12, 2007
Location: Lititz, PA

Cimbali Max versus Junior tasting

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by jesawdy on Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:12 am

I spent one day last week with the Max and Junior side by side.... not to do anything exhaustive, but to pull a few too many shots one day and compare them. Very informal... no notes, no blind tasting, just impressions.

Form and function of both machines are identical as touched upon before... there are some things I like on the Junior better, but that is mostly a "comfort" thing I think.

Image
The setup

It took a few attempts to get the two grinders to pull similar shots on Silvia..... I used 18g and 14g ridgeless baskets in the testing, no WDT for either. Once I had things dialed in, I did note that the 18g basket is about 18g capacity at leveling (you could updose with tapping or other methods), but the 14g seems closer to 16g capacity at leveling. I prepared the shots in a typical manner, grind per shot, thwack the doser to a heaping mound, no tapping of the PF and just a "garden tending", NSEW sweep of the grinds in the PF. I did weigh the shot in the basket, but only to see that I was within 1 gram or less. I specifically did not try WDT, just to see if I had any disastrous shots.

Well, I managed to get myself pretty hopped up on caffeine... probably about 7 shots from each or so. I perceive a difference in the taste from one to the other. Whether it is real or imagined, I don't know. I found the Max shots to be "bigger" and more varied in flavors.... the Junior shots to be "smaller" and more subtle. This is what I told Ken the other day...

jesawdy wrote:I perceived a difference today... whether real or imagined I don't know. I would not say one was better than the next, but different. The Junior seems to produce a flatter taste profile, and the Max more varied, and perhaps brighter. Whether that difference is real, or even desirable for that matter, is debatable.


I have to more to add but need to run.
Jeff Sawdy
User avatar
jesawdy
 
Posts: 1592
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Black Mtn, NC

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by Ken Fox on Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:22 pm

diab0lus wrote:
Do you know of any other grinders less than 4 feet tall and 150 lb. that uses 120v and conical and planar burr sets?

Thanks,


Cimbali is the only company I'm aware of that uses this burr set, other than the planar portion of it which is found in the Versalab. To my knowledge, the Max is the only grinder Cimbali makes now that uses this burr set. I have to qualify this because the Cimbali website is perhaps the WORST espresso machine website out there, and I would not consider that a very good source of information on the current Cimbali grinder range. I am unable on any other Cimbali related website to find other Cimbali mixed conical/planar grinders, either, so I doubt they exist.

The burr set in this grinder used to be attributed to a company called DRM. Whatever became of them appears shrouded in mystery, and they may well have been a division of Cimbali even in the past. I know of no evidence that any other manufacturer has used or is using this DRM burr set.

I really can't explain what I mean by saying the shots taste "rounder." I think that if you did a very large number of paired bind tasted shots between the Junior and the Max, that a difference would unfold. I am, however, uninterested in doing this sort of a study since I don't think that what you would learn from it would be worth the effort.

ken

EDIT: This grinder does NOT appear to have the original DRM burr set, but rather a slightly downsized version.
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 1063
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by jesawdy on Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:28 pm

jesawdy wrote:I have to more to add but need to run.


Okay to continue, I find it kinda funny that Ken described his Max shots as "rounder" and less "jagged"..... while it is hard to say exactly what he meant by that, I might interpret it as better balanced. To point out that taste is subjective (and remembering how informal and non-exhaustive this was), my little taste test seemed to go the other way. I enjoyed the Max shots, and probably preferred them, but my impression of the Junior shots were of better balance, more subtle and less "jagged". I could see someone enjoying a more subtle shot, over a more jarring or bold one.

In regards to grind distribution and needing to use WDT, I did not find the need. The grinds do get clumpy if you do not keep the grinder chute cleaned, but it was easily overcome with the NSEW finger sweeps and tamp. While perhaps not perfect every time, it did not seem to matter much for me. I even just let the grinds fall a few times, no doser handle thwacking, to little detriment. I'm not saying it "lays the grinds out", I don't really think it does... that's what the M3 is all about.

All that said, I think the Max is a great grinder and I look forward to comparing to a full conical grinder someday.

Some final comments of my first look, I think the Max is a very good grinder built to typical Cimbali standards, but I don't think the Max is for everyone, see below:
    If you are an obsessive compulsive neat freak, doserless and WDT are the friends of neatniks.

    If you like to weigh your beans and grind per shot and extract every last coffee grind and bean from your grinder, carry forth. The conical burr really tosses the beans around in the hopper and you can grind for 30 extra seconds and they may still be hopping around (this might be addressable with a heavily modified hopper chute and the weight of a tamper on the beans or some similar design, see Zix's prior proposal, I think it would work great). I always have a few days worth of beans in the hopper so no problem for my style.

    Retained grind in the grinder's chute are less of a problem, if you make a habit of brushing it clean very regularly, I just don't by personal preference. The grinder seems to spew forth grinds and be less clumpy with the grind chute cleaned, so this would probably be a good practice. My only 'mod' thus far has been the addition of a mini Post-It note where the finger guard should be... this helps force the grinds straight down in the doser when the chute is cleaned. Cheap and simple (see pic below).

    The Max features a rocker-style power switch in a water resistant cover, the Junior has a push button style button that I much prefer (nothing that ~$35 and call to a parts house couldn't fix). If you never had the Junior to compare, you'd be none the wiser and happy with the rocker switch (see pics below).

    The Max is tall, the Junior hopper will fit, but it costs $100+ and I have only seen it available from one on-line supplier (cafeparts.com), YMMV with a call to your Cimabli rep. A homebuilt "mini-hopper" solution might work out very well.

    Grind time is slower. As trivial as it seems, it takes about 15 seconds to grind a double on the Max and 7-8 seconds on the Junior. If you're in the rapid thwack camp, that's a lot of thwacking :lol: . Slow down the thwacking and save your ears and wrist.


Image
The Cimbali Junior push button power switch- preferred by me

Image
The Cimbali Max rocker power switch - begging for a separate grinder timer

Image
The Max Post-It "mod", in lieu of the finger guard/paddle switch for auto-grind
Jeff Sawdy
User avatar
jesawdy
 
Posts: 1592
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Black Mtn, NC

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by cafeIKE on Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:29 pm

Ken Fox wrote:This may not go over too well with those married individuals among us, however

A simple 'justification routine'... take the missus to a local shop and buy her a 'latte'... the grousing stops the instant they set down the 'shaving foam'...
User avatar
cafeIKE
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by MellowCat on Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:02 pm

Ken Fox wrote:... I also have two Junior grinders, which have joined their first cousin, a Cimbali Cadet, down in the basement. My experience with the Cadet grinder goes back about 11 or 12 years, to the beginnings of my own personal espresso journey,


Ken you mentioned some differences between the Junior grinder and the Cadet - I was curious as to what they were. I was previously under the impression that they were the same grinder with different names. Thanks in advance

/K
MellowCat
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Nov 07, 2006
Location: Toronto/London, UK

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by Ken Fox on Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:10 pm

MellowCat wrote:Ken you mentioned some differences between the Junior grinder and the Cadet - I was curious as to what they were. I was previously under the impression that they were the same grinder with different names. Thanks in advance

/K


The Cadet, which to my knowledge is no longer manufactured, has the larger bean hopper you now find on the Max (minus the decorative badge on the front you have on the Max). It also has autogrind and a rocker switch.

Otherwise, it is the same grinder as the Junior and uses the same 64mm Cimbali planar burrs.

As far as the grinds that you get, they are identical.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 1063
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by jesawdy on Mon Apr 02, 2007 8:06 pm

Pictures added above.

diab0lus wrote:Do you know of any other grinders less than 4 feet tall and 150 lb. that uses 120v and conical and planar burr sets?


Here's a pic of a La San Marco burr set that I stumbled upon..

Image
La San Marco burr set, photo from Jepy's homepage here.
Jeff Sawdy
User avatar
jesawdy
 
Posts: 1592
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Black Mtn, NC

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by diab0lus on Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:14 pm

jesawdy wrote:Here's a pic of a La San Marco burr set that I stumbled upon somewhere (I don't recall where).


That is the 240V La San Marco MK (or maybe an earlier version) burr set. You know, maybe I should remove my 120V requirement. My dad is a professional electrician. I could have 240V run to the grinder if needed. Although, this one is probably a bit out of my <$900 price range I'll have to keep an eye out for it second hand, which will probably still be out of my price range.

http://www.lasanmarco.it/jsps/tec...pe=null&language=E

Thanks for the review update. I am starting to like the Max more and more. My only problem might be finding one (new or second hand).

Ryan
-Ryan
User avatar
diab0lus
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mar 12, 2007
Location: Lititz, PA

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by diab0lus on Mon Apr 02, 2007 11:04 pm

Ken Fox wrote:I have to qualify this because the Cimbali website is perhaps the WORST espresso machine website out there, and I would not consider that a very good source of information on the current Cimbali grinder range. I am unable on any other Cimbali related website to find other Cimbali mixed conical/planar grinders, either, so I doubt they exist.


Thanks for looking into it. Apparently the Cimbali reps and resellers aren't exactly up to date either. The old buy-it-and-find-out-yourself marketing approach.

If you don't mind me asking, where did you get your Maxs? SierraCafe.com ?
-Ryan
User avatar
diab0lus
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mar 12, 2007
Location: Lititz, PA

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by Ken Fox on Tue Apr 03, 2007 12:46 am

diab0lus wrote:Thanks for looking into it.
If you don't mind me asking, where did you get your Maxs? SierraCafe.com ?


I did not buy my Max grinders from Sierra Cafe, about whom I've heard nothing, at least not anything good. If memory serves, another forum member tried to buy the Max from that website and never did get a grinder, and only got his money back after threatening to do a chargeback with his credit card company.

I got the grinders through a special order, with someone doing me a big favor. There is another one of these Max grinders (not Jeff's one) that is going to float around with several well known personages here having a chance to use it. If the grinder is received positively, if there is a "buzz" created around it by those who have used it and like it, I believe the possibility exists that it will start being imported into the US Market and will be offered for sale by some of "the usual suspects." I believe that originally there was reluctance to sell it over here due to the autogrind function, but with increased interest in conicals, that reservation was felt less important.

If this happens I think these will begin to appear for sale here within the next 6 months or so, but I don't know that, I'm only guessing it. And if it is to be offered for sale here, I'd advise they make a special USA HB model which would be with the shorter hopper and possibly substitution of the Junior type on off switch in favor of the Max's rocker type switch. Of course, given the relatively small number of models likely to be sold, it may not be worth the expense to Cimbali to tinker with the current design, in which case I think most people would still find it to be a great grinder.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 1063
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho
espresso machines at 1st-line.com
espresso machines at 1st-line.com

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by Jepy on Tue Apr 03, 2007 2:17 am

jesawdy wrote:Pictures added above.



Here's a pic of a La San Marco burr set that I stumbled upon somewhere (I don't recall where).

<image>
La San Marco burr set?


That was a pic I took in Italy, I think I have other burrs on that page as well. By the way, you guys with the Max grinders should look close before ordering 68mm replacement planar burrs. The 68s were from the DRM-Alinox belt driven grinder, and AFAIK the Max uses 64mm
User avatar
Jepy
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Location: Bay Area

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by Ken Fox on Tue Apr 03, 2007 9:10 am

Jepy wrote:That was a pic I took in Italy, I think I have other burrs on that page as well. By the way, you guys with the Max grinders should look close before ordering 68mm replacement planar burrs. The 68s were from the DRM-Alinox belt driven grinder, and AFAIK the Max uses 64mm


What is your source of information on the diameter of the Max's planar burr set? I have seen that number myself, however it was on a Cimbali (or derivative of a Cimbali) webpage that is chock full of other errors making anything on that page hard to believe. Unless the conical burrs were re-engineered for the Max from the prior DRM grinders, would 64mm planar burrs even work with those Conicals?

Of course, they might be 64mm; Jeff has taken his grinder apart so hopefully he can set us straight!

ken

EDIT: I have gone into my parts stash and pulled out spare 64mm and 68mm Cimbali burrs. On first visual inspection, the pictures that Jeff posted look like the 68mm burr set.

Then, I counted the number of burr "knives" that are in between each attachment screw hole. On the 68mm set, as on the burr set in Jeff's excellent pictures, there are 12 knives. The 64mm burrs are harder to count knives on (they are smaller) but there appear to be 15, and definitely NOT 12.

On the basis of the above, I'd say that the Max has 68mm planar burrs in spite of anything one might find on an otherwise innacurate webpage.
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 1063
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by Jepy on Tue Apr 03, 2007 10:28 am

I was at a trade show in Italy doing some research for parts, and asked about the DRM sets, and Cimbali said it doesn't exist anymore, just the planars. Anyways, my theory was that the Max is a direct drive grinder, and since the DRM was 1/2 the speed and belt driven with more torque, the burrs probably had to be slightly different. I could be wrong, since I haven't measured a Max myself before, but even in Jeff's pics the conical looks a little different. Time to get the caliper out
User avatar
Jepy
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Location: Bay Area

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by jesawdy on Tue Apr 03, 2007 10:48 am

Jepy wrote:Time to get the caliper out


What all would you like to know?... just the diameter of the planars? I can measure late tonight. I *think* the planar burrs are 64mm but I never measured.
Jeff Sawdy
User avatar
jesawdy
 
Posts: 1592
Joined: May 12, 2006
Location: Black Mtn, NC

Link to "La Cimbali Max Grinder - a first look"by Ken Fox on Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:18 am

jesawdy wrote:What all would you like to know... just the diameter of the planars? I can measure late tonight. I *think* the planar burrs are 64mm but I never measured.


I have no question at this point based upon examining the pictures Jeff has posted, that the burr pattern in his Max planar burrs looks identical to the pattern in the pair of 68mm replacement burrs I have. I cannot exclude the possibility that there are TWO versions of Cimbali 64mm burrs with two different patterns one identical or nearly so to their 68mm planar burrs.

The 64mm replacement burrs I have look like this, on the cutting side:

Image

And this on the back side:

Image

Although these are "knockoff" burrs, when I replaced a set in one of my Juniors 2 or 3 months ago, I compared the OEM to the knockoff ones and they looked identical.

Here is a picture of the back of some replacement 68mm burrs:

Image


Since these are in a sealed bag I don't want to open them, but there is enough room in the bag that I could examine the burr pattern carefully and it looks just like the picture that Jeff posted. Also notice that on the back, the 68mm burrs are flat, whereas there is a recessed center on the 64mm burrs.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 1063
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

PreviousNext

Return to Espresso Grinders