DannyBoy21 wrote:Here's a favorable first-look from Coffeegeek where they mention the calibration (talked about in the manual, apparently) to make the machine grind finer or coarser depending on your preferences. http://www.coffeegeek.com/proreviews/firstlook/kitchenaidprolinegrinder/details. Although some people say that the grinder can choke their machines out of the box, so the finer adjustment might not even be necessary.
Perhaps it's me, but I find it very difficult to take Amazon's online reviews seriously. Heck, I find it difficult to take some consumer reviews seriously on CoffeeGeek, here, or on ANY online forum unless and until I get the feeling of knowing and trusting the individual from reading his or her posts and have some mutual reference upon which to judge. (For example, if someone raves about a specific wine that I have experience with and also enjoy, I am more likely to give weight to that person's review of a wine I haven't tried before; conversely, if I dislike the wine he or she raves about . . . )DannyBoy21 wrote:Amazon reviews are across-the-board enthusiastic: http://www.amazon.com/KitchenAid-...lic/dp/B00030IEJG/
Let's look overall for a moment. 56 reviews is a lot of reviews -- more than, say, a Mazzer Mini (45)! The "score" averages 7.8 on a scale of 1-to-10. The Mazzer Mini (admittedly more money and out of your price range) averages 9.3. Rancillio's Rocky has 58 reviews and averages 8.9. Gaggia MDF, 25 reviews, 8.0 rating. Ascaso, 20, 8.2. You can grab a whole lot of numbers . . . I'm not sure it proves anything. After all, it's not the number of reviews, but the quality of the reviews (as well as -- obviously -- the quality of the machine itself!) that matters.DannyBoy21 wrote:And, although I am picking and choosing among many coffeegeek reviews, here's one: http://www.coffeegeek.com/reviews/grinders/kitchenaidprolinegrinder/JoeZone. Here's the full list of coffeegeek reviews http://www.coffeegeek.com/reviews/grinders/kitchenaidprolinegrinder.
Clicking the "JoeZone" link you provided leaves me scratching my head. Kent Simmons' review describes it as "too coarse for espresso," and the author describes selling it on eBay and buying a Rocky instead!
I can understand budgetary limitations, Danny; but I cannot understand why you seem so wedded to the idea of a KA (unless you've already purchased it, in which case the discussion is moot).
I honestly don't find reviews that say every grinder under $500 is unacceptable for espresso. Maybe we're looking at different places.DannyBoy21 wrote:Admittedly, a lot of reviews say that the grinder is not acceptable for espresso, but honestly, I find those reviews in every single grinder under $500. The espresso community is certainly diverse and vociferous (and more power to them!), so it seems hard to please everybody.
One more thing . . .
First of all, never take tomatoes seriously. We are a passionate bunch, it's true, but don't take it personally.DannyBoy21 wrote:At the risk of opening myself up for more tomatoes, do all of your same criticisms apply to the KA when the machine is recalibrated to a 250 micron finest grind and the stepless mod is added?
Finally, about those mods -- even with the mods, though, I'd call your attention to what Henry Buchtel wrote:
He did the mod four months ago, and is looking forward to upgrading . . . .hbuchtel wrote:If you do get the KA, I think the stepless is absolutely necessary, but I didn't notice any difference after doing the teflon tape mod (about 4 months ago). I am looking forward to upgrading my grinder to see what (if anything) I've been missing.![]()
Cheers,
Jason





