Jim
shadowfax wrote:John, I've been drifting off on CG and here, but I still check the Look out JonR! thread... I'm always amused and jealous at how perfect all the shots you ever post have been. I seem to remember in your earlier days, before you were such a "big naked sensation," that you suggested the method you and Dan just described and you were criticized quite a bit on CG for a method that "seemed like it would produce very inconsistent results" or something to that effect.
Now I'm starting to feel like I should go to the biochemistry lab and maybe swipe a dissecting needle...
puffinjk wrote:John, could you share the photos you posted of your method on cg? I'm sure everone would find them quite helpful.
Thanks Jim
HB wrote:Ah yes, the Chicago Chop. Before you deride the moniker, recall that Intelligentsia's crew took four of the top six positions at the 2006 Great Lakes Regional Barista Competition.
barry wrote:iirc, not a single Intelly competitor used the Chop at the 2006 GLRBC.
--barry "tech/head judge, 2006 GLRBC"
RapidCoffee wrote:Thanks Nick! Sorry to read about your Valentina woes; hope you can get them resolved.
who has a grinder with an even pattern? the only people I know of are those b******ds with the Versalab grinder. I have an old super jolly with the front-end of a Mazzer Mini-E. It's easier to clean than a doser, but not any more even.I do not wish to make overblown claims for this method. If you already have well-developed dosing/distribution skills, it may not help. If your grinder doses in a nice even pattern, ditto. It's probably not going to work well with mid-dose tamp regimens such as JonR's naked triple technique. If speed is your goal, work on Stockfleth's instead (which I've never mastered).
Thanks for the offer, but I found a sharp little pecan pick that went with my roommate's long-abandoned pecan-cracking-thingy, and it seems to work. Maybe something thinner like a needle would be preferable. I don't have the yogurt bottom thing yet (it's on the grocery list), but I rolled up some paper and taped it in place just to try out the concept.But... if you are having trouble with clumping grounds or uneven distribution, it might be worth a try. I have a couple of old dissecting kits from my biomedical science days; email me your address and I'll send you a dissecting needle. I'd hate to see you turn to a life of crime. Heck, if there's any interest, I'll order a batch and send them out on request. They're inexpensive, but the S&H cost for one would be ridiculous. You're on your own wrt the yogurt funnel (I like yogurt, but not THAT much).
shadowfax wrote:When you were developing this little trick, did you have trouble with side seals? As I mentioned with the regular stockfleth's move that I worked on this weekend, doing a bit of NSEW pushing at the end seemed to fix the problem there, but not so much with the stirring method.
HB wrote:Ah yes, the Chicago Chop. Before you deride the moniker, recall that Intelligentsia's crew took four of the top six positions at the 2006 Great Lakes Regional Barista Competition. I'm always experimenting with different techniques, especially with ones that (a) are easy to explain, and (b) give a leg up to new home baristas. I tried it for a couple weeks and found the Chicago Chop was consistent and easy.
Meta-comment: Matt Riddle and the rest at Intelligentsia are clearly top-notch baristas. I wonder if they employ this distribution "crutch move" at their cafes, or if it's reserved for their less experienced baristas?
another_jim wrote:In every skill I've acquired, the techniques were verbal descriptions one used to train beginners. By the time anyone gets good, the technique has morphed into something idiosyncratic that works for that person. Trouble is, these expert idiosyncrasies can't be easily described or taught, so techniques are necessary, if only for basic training.