www.cafemakers.com: good coffee brings good business

Everything we know may be wrong

Beginner or pro barista, all are invited to share.

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by Marshall on Sun May 04, 2008 8:02 pm

I feel like I'm living in the British "new techniques" video Sweaner posted, except it's been a weekend with some very reliable baristas and roasters at SCAA in Minneapolis. Fresh coffee? Forget it. They're using 8 to 10 day old roasts. Kyle Glanville was recommending leaving the bag open a while before putting it in a container with an inch or two of air space to accelerate the aging.

25-second pour? Nah. 8 seconds after preinfusion works great on one blend I was given. Much to think about and experiment with after this trip.
Marshall
Los Angeles
User avatar
Marshall
 
Posts: 659
Joined: May 13, 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by BobS on Mon May 05, 2008 12:03 am

Tom of Sweet Marias has been saying for several years now that there are espressos that he likes better aged towards the end of two weeks. And at a talk I attended at this years WBC, Heather Perry's Dad stated that they typically aim many of their espresso blends to have a peak flavor from 7 to 10 days after roasting.

Bob
BobS
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Apr 18, 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
www.cafemakers.com: good coffee brings good business
www.cafemakers.com: good coffee brings good business

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by miKe mcKoffee on Mon May 05, 2008 1:18 am

I've been roasting only a scant 8 years but have been saying since shortly after beginning the roasting journey experiencing coffee from right out the roaster on out most coffees don't really come alive until at least 4 or 5 days rest. And target roasts for my Kafe grinders to hit at 1 week earliest.

Haven't experienced a good 8 second pull myself, yet. But then, haven't tried to either... I do know my main Ohana blend less than 25sec and risking sour, target 27.
aka Mike McGinness
http://www.mcKonaKoffee.com
User avatar
miKe mcKoffee
 
Posts: 1051
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA, USA

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by howard seth on Mon May 05, 2008 2:56 am

Good lord! an 8 second pour boggles the mind. I never made an espresso that was drinkable under 15 seconds on any machine I have tried. I rather drink a minute pour. Was it called H. 'Houdini's Magic Blend'?

Howard
Howard Seth Miller
http://howseth.com
howard seth
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Location: Santa Cruz County, California

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by luca on Mon May 05, 2008 4:24 am

The idea of using coffee at older than 7 days is hardly news. For example, I *think* that Paul Bassett won the WBC in 2003 with 28 day old coffee. Klaus' was certainly older than 10 days at the '06 WBC ... I seem to remember 21 days being the figure.

8 seconds after preinfusion ... are we talking about an 18 second pour here?

Cheers,

Luca
User avatar
luca
 
Posts: 371
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by cannonfodder on Mon May 05, 2008 7:32 am

So Starbucks coffee is now fresh? 8 second extractions? If it were not coming from you, I would call you nuts.
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
 
Posts: 3894
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Dayton, Oh

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by seacliff dweller on Mon May 05, 2008 9:42 am

Marshall wrote:I feel like I'm living in the British "new techniques" video Sweazer poster, except it's been a weekend with some very reliable baristas and roasters at SCAA in Minneapolis. Fresh coffee? Forget it. They're using 8 to 10 day old roasts. Kyle Glanville was recommending leaving the bag open a while before putting it in a container with an inch or two of air space to accelerate the aging.

25-second pour? Nah. 8 seconds after preinfusion works great on one blend I was given. Much to think about and experiment with after this trip.


So true, I think SCAA should revise 2 of their specialty coffee facts:
1. Specialty coffee is defined as a coffee that has no defects - unless you are talking about Simon Hsieh's zero defect beans.
2. To be considered truly fresh, coffee should be ground right before brewing and brewed within three to seven days of roasting - but controlled aging is quite common these days. Maybe the next thing is collecting grinder gas and pump it into the bean container under pressure!
seacliff dweller
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Feb 16, 2008
Location: san francisco

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by VS_DoubleShot on Tue May 06, 2008 5:47 pm

On a dark roast the oils come to the surface of the beans...if you have a lighter roast perhaps it makes sense that the oils take longer to dry out since they remain mostly within the bean.



8 seconds after preinfusion - how long was preinfusion? Makes sense if preinfusion lasted a few seconds.
VS_DoubleShot
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Apr 12, 2006
Location: NY

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by DigMe on Thu May 08, 2008 4:38 pm

VS_DoubleShot wrote:On a dark roast the oils come to the surface of the beans...if you have a lighter roast perhaps it makes sense that the oils take longer to dry out since they remain mostly within the bean.



8 seconds after preinfusion - how long was preinfusion? Makes sense if preinfusion lasted a few seconds.


I don't see any espresso coming out of the spout until 8 to 10 seconds in so 16 to 18 second pour would be much more believable as possibly producing a good shot than the 8 second pour that some were reading it as. I've always timed my shots from the moment the pump comes on and shot for 25 to 30 seconds if I'm doing a normale.

And since when is 8 to 10 days not considered fresh??

brad
DigMe
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Waco

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by Marshall on Thu May 08, 2008 4:54 pm

DigMe wrote:And since when is 8 to 10 days not considered fresh??

brad

Read the home roaster boards, where freshness is God. Some home roasters consider anything over 4 days "undrinkable."
Marshall
Los Angeles
User avatar
Marshall
 
Posts: 659
Joined: May 13, 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by Marshall on Thu May 08, 2008 4:56 pm

seacliff dweller wrote:So true, I think SCAA should revise 2 of their specialty coffee facts:
1. Specialty coffee is defined as a coffee that has no defects - unless you are talking about Simon Hsieh's zero defect beans.
2. To be considered truly fresh, coffee should be ground right before brewing and brewed within three to seven days of roasting - but controlled aging is quite common these days. Maybe the next thing is collecting grinder gas and pump it into the bean container under pressure!

This points up the difficulty of establishing technical standards. Someone is always learning something new.
Marshall
Los Angeles
User avatar
Marshall
 
Posts: 659
Joined: May 13, 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by DigMe on Thu May 08, 2008 5:04 pm

Marshall wrote:Read the home roaster boards, where freshness is God. Some home roasters consider anything over 4 days "undrinkable."


Wow...my espresso roasts don't get really good until about 4 days.

brad
DigMe
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Waco

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by gscace on Thu May 08, 2008 5:42 pm

VS_DoubleShot wrote:On a dark roast the oils come to the surface of the beans...if you have a lighter roast perhaps it makes sense that the oils take longer to dry out since they remain mostly within the bean.



8 seconds after preinfusion - how long was preinfusion? Makes sense if preinfusion lasted a few seconds.



Good observation. The machine used was a 2-group Mistral with individual brew boilers and paddle groups. The paddle groups allowed long pre-infusions with the pre-infusion pressure set by flo-jet pump (bottle-fed because the thing was at a trade show). The combined pre-infusion and extraction times were within the range that we all consider normal. The amount of time at full pressure was around 8 to 10 secs. The shot of Black Cat (yep it was Intelligentsia's booth) I had was phenomenal and the SO espressos that they were pulling were very interesting.

The extraction pressure profile didn't surprise me a whole lot. I have been using long pre-infusions for a while now as I learn more about pressure profiling. What did surprise me was the level of interest in pressure profiling and the amount of exploration already happening at bleeding edge shops.

-Greg
gscace
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Aug 12, 2005
Location: Laytonsville MD

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by gscace on Thu May 08, 2008 5:46 pm

Marshall wrote:I feel like I'm living in the British "new techniques" video Sweaner posted, except it's been a weekend with some very reliable baristas and roasters at SCAA in Minneapolis. Fresh coffee? Forget it. They're using 8 to 10 day old roasts. Kyle Glanville was recommending leaving the bag open a while before putting it in a container with an inch or two of air space to accelerate the aging.

25-second pour? Nah. 8 seconds after preinfusion works great on one blend I was given. Much to think about and experiment with after this trip.


You are a very smart and observant person. Have you not observed the taste of coffee as it ages and wondered why folks adhered to "gotta be completely fresh" dogma? What I like about the SCAA shows is that you realize that experimentation is alive, folks do taste coffee and are not afraid to let their technique be guided by taste. It's all good and yes, it was very interesting.

-Greg
gscace
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Aug 12, 2005
Location: Laytonsville MD

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by seacliff dweller on Fri May 09, 2008 1:49 am

Marshall wrote:This points up the difficulty of establishing technical standards. Someone is always learning something new.

Maybe some oxidation of the volatile aromatics is good? I wish there are research papers out there I can read that will tell me the flavor time curve - when it peaks and start declining. This is pretty interesting. Coffee roasting has been around for ages, maybe from the 10th century but we still don't know much about coffee, or because tastes and preferences changed?
seacliff dweller
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Feb 16, 2008
Location: san francisco
www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you
www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by roblumba on Fri May 09, 2008 12:12 pm

Each type of coffee bean probably behaves differently and perhaps the flavors that you wanted in one bean in the blend disappear while the flavors you wanted in another bean, arrive. I forget which one, but one of the World Barista Champions had aged his beans for a different length of time. I think one was 7 days old and the other 14 days old. Now that would be some fancy roasting when a roaster starts offering beans with optimized aging. But how long do you let that blend sit on your shelf at home? Practically speaking, it become a bit difficult to manage on a commercial scale or even for the home user.
roblumba
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Feb 02, 2006
Location: San Jose, CA

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by CSME9 on Fri May 09, 2008 12:20 pm

I am pulling great 25-40 second shots on 2-3 week old roasts.

WS
CSME9
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Jun 02, 2005
Location: EL Paso, Tx.

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by Marshall on Fri May 09, 2008 12:23 pm

roblumba wrote:Each type of coffee bean probably behaves differently and perhaps the flavors that you wanted in one bean in the blend disappear while the flavors you wanted in another bean, arrive. I forget which one, but one of the World Barista Champions had aged his beans for a different length of time. I think one was 7 days old and the other 14 days old. Now that would be some fancy roasting when a roaster starts offering beans with optimized aging. But how long do you let that blend sit on your shelf at home? Practically speaking, it become a bit difficult to manage on a commercial scale or even for the home user.

I talked to Kyle Glanville about that. What's the optimum buy/use time for consumers, who may take a week, instead of an hour, to consume a pound? He suggested 7 to 14 days as a good window for brewing the current Black Cat, which is roasted lighter than some previous iterations.
Marshall
Los Angeles
User avatar
Marshall
 
Posts: 659
Joined: May 13, 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by DigMe on Fri May 09, 2008 12:28 pm

Marshall wrote:the current Black Cat, which is roasted lighter than some previous iterations.


Hmm... I thought it was just my faulty memory that the BC was lighter last time I had some but I guess not!

brad
DigMe
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Oct 14, 2006
Location: Waco

Link to "Everything we know may be wrong"by barry on Fri May 09, 2008 9:57 pm

gscace wrote:The extraction pressure profile didn't surprise me a whole lot. I have been using long pre-infusions for a while now as I learn more about pressure profiling.


I've been using long preinfusions on superautomatics with very good results.
User avatar
barry
 
Posts: 510
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: St Louis, MO

Next

Return to Tips and Techniques