HB wrote:Pointer to a recent related discussion in coffeed.com, including an exchange on the "Cannonfodder Device" (page 2).
Wow, I honestly never thought this would get more than a glance for curiosity. Let alone discussed on other forums or have it dubbed the "Cannonfodder device".
That other PF device looks good. If I was in the business, dropping $300 on that device to fine tune my commercial machine would be fine. However, your average Joe is not going to spend $300 on a temp basket (at least I cannot afford that
I have told everyone that has emailed me, and posted in a thread or two where it was mentioned, that this is a digital thermometer, not a thermocouple. As such, it should not be relied on as an accurate test device. It is intended to give you a way of achieving a repeatable temperature range on your average Joe's budget. My time is free and I prefer to spend it making something useful over sitting on the couch watching TV. Regardless of whether the display shows 201 but the water temp is actually 199, you still get a repeatable baseline to work from. Now if you wanted to do thermal testing for analysis, don't use this, get the Scace device, it has the accuracy needed and is of a much better and sounder design. Just pop it into any naked PF and away you go. One is for the average Joe, the other for professionals that truly need half degree accuracy to fine tune their equipment.
Just my .02







