www.counterculturecoffee.com: coffee driven people, people driven coffee

Conti marries Achille

A haven dedicated to lever espresso machine aficionados.

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by hbuchtel on Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:17 pm

Well the title is an obvious reference to the 'Peppina marries MiniGaggia' thread, which this thread is an offshoot of!

The designs there and here both use brew-temperature boilers/kettles (as opposed to the pressurized boiler Pavoni design) but differ in the method of delivering and heating the brew water.
    "Conti" refers to the Conti Comocafe and its displaced piston/chamber
    "Achille" refers to the Gaggia Achille's Heat Exchanger system.
This 'Front Page' will serve as an index of sorts, to reflect the current design and link to the relevant posts.

There are two designs, the first is a basic espresso-only machine, while the second will incorporate all the design elements brought up in this thread.

First- Espresso only.

The main elements of this design are-
    1. Heat Exchanger in a non-pressurized boiler.

    2. Piston position chosen for stability.

    3. One-way valves on the piston (like the Achille design).

    4. Group attached directly to the boiler.
Image

Second- Super machine!

All of the above and also including-
    1. Pressure gauge for brew pressure.

    2. Control of temperature profile during the shot.

    3. Steam for milk drinks.

    4. Hot water tap for tea/cocoa.

    5. More+better temperature displays.

    6. PID
There are many design elements which are up in the air, but the immediate goal of this thread is to hammer out a basic design which could be tested by many people. Some parts of the design would have to be custom made, some parts could be bought or 'borrowed' from stock machines. I have yet to find a site selling the stock Achille group.

Custom made-
    HX tube.
    Piston chamber.
    Frame.
Stock-(of course it is important to choose compatible parts! I haven't done a very good job of that with these links!)
    Group.
    Dispersion block.
    Dispersion screen.(1)
    Portafilter + baskets.
    Piston.
    One-way valves.
    Lever mechanism.(1)
    Complete lever mechanism w/out chamber (1, 2)
    Temperature displays/controls.
    Fittings.(1)
    Heating Element.
To add more links please PM me.

Thanks for all contributions!

Henry
LMWDP #53
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by hbuchtel on Sat Dec 02, 2006 10:55 pm

One big question:

Should the goal be to produce a 'flat' temperature profile or to have control over the temperature profile?

Opinions needed!

I think the question of whether flat or falling profiles are better is very much up in the air, and I would personally love to have a machine which could produce both! There are currently no commercially available machines which allow control over both pressure and temperature profile (during the shot).

With the HX design it would be possible to create flat, falling, and rising profiles by using (for example) 3 small boilers (each warming a portion of the HX tube) or one compartmentalized boiler with separate heating elements.

Or to compare flat and falling, a single boiler with two HX tubes, one long and one short . . .

While it would be interesting, perhaps the first goal should be to make a functioning flat-profile machine?

Henry
LMWDP #53
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan
www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you
www.wholelattelove.com: our caffeinated commitment to you

Reading

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by hbuchtel on Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:09 am

Some relevant reading-

Dave's (Cannonfodder) explaination of the Achille Piston and HX.

Jim Schulman's original review of the La Peppina.

Gaggia Achille parts diagram
Image

FE-AR La Peppina parts diagram
Image

Henry
LMWDP #53
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan

Re: Peppina marries Achille

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by espressme on Sun Dec 03, 2006 12:26 pm

hbuchtel wrote:Well the title is an obvious reference to the 'Peppina marries MiniGaggia' thread, which this thread is an offshoot of!

Hello Henry,
We are fortunate to have a great deal of information from that long running thread. There were a lot of good suggestions and part and material selection and location possibilities. So, lets get on with the show!

The two proposed designs both use brew-temperature boilers/kettles (as opposed to the pressurized boiler Pavoni design) but differ in the method of delivering and heating the brew water.

The main elements of this design are-


1. Heat Exchanger in a non-pressurized boiler.

I like the directions you were going in the other thread. ( HX coil experiments could be accomplished by using an electric deep fryer vs. electric fry pan for the HX coil shape and orientation.) A torn down and modified monoblock pump machine or even steam toy would furnish the group that , for experiments, could be isolated and separately held at temperature from the metal of the HX kettle pot or pan.
2. Piston position chosen for stability.
    1.With the piston placement being movable in the design, The piston could be driven by a rack or a leverage system. ( As an aside, The same lever that pulls the shot could, at choice, be used to drive water into a second steam flash-boiler. This would be done by a simple leverage ratio and mechanical flow switch {two way}change.) The difference in leverage is to give high pressure with a low volume into a small flash-boiler to provide steam.
    2. I've checked out air / liquid cylinders and the food safe ones are in the $200 dollar range for what we might want. Therefore I might suggest that we make our own using the information from the other thread on the super "V" rings.
    3. Also, lets think about Hot water for the drinks of our not so enamored acquaintances, or their children.

3. One-way valves on the piston (like the Achille design).

I shall re-read Cannonfodder's article on the Achille. It does seem to me that since the kettle is at X °C or °F it could be left as stale water ( thereby requiring attention.) Or as in the Achille it would be refilled by the one way valve ( thereby being covered and unpressurized but not stale.)

(I will update this to reflect any changes in design)

There are many design elements which are up in the air, but the immediate goal of this thread is to hammer out a basic design which could be tested by many people. I personally should have time to make a working model in January.
Thanks for all contributions!
Henry

Many of the above possibilities may seem mutually exclusive but could be integrated. Have fun!
Thanks for the opportunity!
Sincerely
richard / Espressme
richard penney LMWDP #090,
User avatar
espressme
 
Posts: 885
Joined: May 31, 2006
Location: Menomonie,WI

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by timo888 on Sun Dec 03, 2006 5:11 pm

hbuchtel wrote:One big question:
Should the goal be to produce a 'flat' temperature profile or to have control over the temperature profile?


In Jim Schulman's review of the Elektra SemiAutomatic, the temperature plot over the course of the extraction is humped, i.e. it rises and then falls almost but not quite symmetrically, something like this:



Jim says the espresso tastes great and I don't doubt it. My bias, if it's a bias, is to avoid having the temperature fall into sour range or rise into bitter range for more than a couple of seconds during the extraction. Some flavors are temperature dependent -- i.e. the same aromatic chemical tastes different on the tongue at different temperatures. But the extraction of some chemicals that taste bad at any temperature occurs only when the water temperature rises too high.

The former tastes could be ameliorated by the final temperature in the cup being in the right range. The latter tastes, however, need to be masked with sugar and/or lots of milk.

Regards
Timo
User avatar
timo888
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Location: Pennsylvania

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by timo888 on Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:38 pm

I neglected to say in my earlier post that the House of FE-AR appreciates your forbearance, Henry, in seeing to it that the hot-tempered Achille does nothing to besmirch its name. :)

Per your request:

---------
If the Comocafe had a cool water reservoir placed behind its kettle, or on the side of the machine opposite the lever for better balance, water could be drawn from the reservoir, through the HX-kettle, and down into the piston chamber.

You might even insert a thermoblock between reservoir and HX kettle to bring the water up to temperature, using the HX-kettle either to raise the water a few more degrees to the desired temperature or to absorb excess heat if the thermoblock had overshot the mark. You might then be able to use the same thermoblock for steam as well, using the HX-kettle to buffer the undershot and overshot temperatures.

Most impressive, like the Centre Pompidou in Paris, the HX's copper coil works would be visible through the glass :)
------

Regards
Timo
User avatar
timo888
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Peppina marries Achille

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by hbuchtel on Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:18 am

A lot of QUESTIONS-

Assuming the simplest possible construction (single boiler, no pre-heating of fresh water, thermostat on boiler, goal of flat-profile doubles)

Questions to be answered-

- if part of the tube is close to or directly above part of the heating element, will this cause a high temperature 'pocket'?

If yes, how can this be avoided in a lo-tech manner?

- How long and wide does the HX tube have to be?

a. Length: (assuming a 20ml flush and 60ml pull)

(1) How much does the temperature of the water in the boiler fall when 80ml of cool water enters the HX tube? (20ml quickly and 60ml slowly).

(2) Does it drop enough to trigger the thermostat?

If yes, perhaps a thermostat over-ride switch is needed.

(3) How much does the drop in boiler temperature affect the temperature of the water in the group-end of the HX tube?

b. Diameter

(1) General HX tube question- Does water in a horizontal tube travel in blocks? When cool water is forced into the end of the tube will it stay there or will it disperse throughout the tube?

Comments: My assumption is that cold water entering the tube will not draw much heat from the water in the front of the tube. To prevent this from happening, the HX tube should enter from the bottom of the boiler (so that the cold water stays at the end of the tube) rather then horizontally or from the top.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The answers to the above questions should give us a minimum length and a maximum diameter for the HX tube.

Henry
LMWDP #53
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan

Re: Peppina marries Achille

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by hbuchtel on Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:44 am

espressme wrote:( As an aside, The same lever that pulls the shot could, at choice, be used to drive water into a second steam flash-boiler. This would be done by a simple leverage ratio and mechanical flow switch {two way}change.) The difference in leverage is to give high pressure with a low volume into a small flash-boiler to provide steam.


That is a great idea! One consideration is how the valve* would affect the flow of water from the piston to the puck . . . I think it is important not to have any tight spots so that there is a lot of feedback from the flow at the puck.

*valve: Did you mean that you could switch a valve so that pressure from the lever could make espresso OR fill the steam boiler?

Does this picture show what you mean? (proportions etc way off . . .)

Image

No comments on your other ideas yet, more reading and thinking to be done!

Henry
LMWDP #53
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan

Re: Peppina marries Achille

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by espressme on Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:39 pm

hbuchtel wrote:That is a great idea! One consideration is how the valve* would affect the flow of water from the piston to the puck . . . I think it is important not to have any tight spots so that there is a lot of feedback from the flow at the puck.
*valve: Did you mean that you could switch a valve so that pressure from the lever could make espresso OR fill the steam boiler?
Does this picture show what you mean? (proportions etc way off . . .)
image: http://www.home-barista.com/forums/userpix/177_SSL22581_1.jpg
No comments on your other ideas yet, more reading and thinking to be done!
Henry

Hello Henry,
That is correct, A valve would do as your diagram suggests. At the same time the lever ratio could be changed. That may not be necessary as the boiler feed pressure would only be about 1.3 Bar max at 260°F. I might suggest a flow restricter, though, to even out the admission of water to the boiler. Stop the lever pressure and the steam stops. Also, a one way valve would prevent steam from entering the piston.

A suggestion is that the steam boiler would be a flash boiler, operating as a wet boiler only when steaming. That is how the simple two heat temperature pump machines work. A large thermal mass at a high temperature giving off heat to a liquid. Obviously, There has to be enough mass at temperature to steam a reasonable amount of water. An OPV would be suggested!

The use of another diverter valve would be to allow water to go to a hot water tap rather than the group. That would allow construction of other drinks.

As to the questions for the HX, Perhaps someone can do the heat transfer equations.
A PID and high wattage element would be necessary to keep an even temp in the kettle.

Consider that one successful machine had a poppet valve like an IC engine as the diverter and anti backflow valve at the Group ( La Peppina has the washer. Since the HX entrance location is relatively inconsequential, that may work.

A spreadsheet seems to be in order to keep track of all the feature possibilities.

I operate on TLABR! = That looks about right. So, I am wondering what would happen if I were to attach a lever and pump to my old DeLonghi Pump machine with the Stainless steel boiler/monoblock????? And, if that works, a PID? Seems that There was an article on CG that dealt with a PID mod'd Hamillton Beach that gave great results. :twisted: Probably would require flushing after steaming though. Is that another thread????

Pleasant thoughts to all!
richard
PS It just dawned on me where you live! :!:

PPS It may be an Idea to have an editable 1st page like LMWDP to hold the features and ideas to make back tracking easier. An index so to speak? That would be a good place for un-answered questions! You could do that by editing your first introduction page as needed.
richard penney LMWDP #090,
User avatar
espressme
 
Posts: 885
Joined: May 31, 2006
Location: Menomonie,WI

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by espressme on Tue Dec 05, 2006 6:16 pm

Hi Folks,
Here is a thread relevant to the discussion:
http://www.home-barista.com/forums/clevis-to-lever-further-explorations-in-espresso-space-t1243.html
Best regards
richard / espressme
richard penney LMWDP #090,
User avatar
espressme
 
Posts: 885
Joined: May 31, 2006
Location: Menomonie,WI

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by hbuchtel on Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:59 am

espressme wrote:Hi Folks,
Here is a thread relevant to the discussion:
http://www.home-barista.com/forums/clevis-to-lever-further-explorations-in-espresso-space-t1243.html
Best regards
richard / espressme


That is an interesting machine. I remember reading it when it was posted but didn't understand it at the time.

espressme wrote:This happens before the intake fill and down-stroke. ( up-stroke to Peppina fans!) This could be a useful (? no hole in piston !) replacement for the hydraulic lock preventer one way valve in the piston.


I grabbed this from your post in the Peppina Marries Minigaggia thread, I think it would work really well here! Not having a hole in the piston would make sourcing parts much easier.

I agree about the need for an often updated first page/post. I'm thinking there could be two parts, one for the most basic functioning design, and one for a 'super' design (including steam, temp profile control, brew pressure gauge, etc etc).

Also one post to keep all the links together.

I just saw this link posted by phijoa in the La Cimbali M20 Lever topic. Oemmeci Coffee machine spare parts. Lots of parts and part diagrams!

So many ideas, so little time . . .

Henry
LMWDP #53
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by espressme on Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:20 am

hbuchtel wrote:I grabbed this from your post in the Peppina Marries Minigaggia thread, I think it would work really well here! Not having a hole in the piston would make sourcing parts much easier.

I agree about the need for an often updated first page/post. I'm thinking there could be two parts, one for the most basic functioning design, and one for a 'super' design (including steam, temp profile control, brew pressure gauge, etc etc).

Also one post to keep all the links together.snip
So many ideas, so little time . . .
Henry
Hello Henry,
Yes, the first page owuld be nice. It would save printing out each day's thread. I noticed on other threads that many times the same suggestion would come up mid page and be lost until another suggested it. That's the trouble with Home and End keys.
You have the so little time thing correct!
Best regards and may your next meal be satisfying!
Sincerely
richard / espressme
richard penney LMWDP #090,
User avatar
espressme
 
Posts: 885
Joined: May 31, 2006
Location: Menomonie,WI

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by mogogear on Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:56 pm

Only a word of "friction loss" caution! As the pressure you exert at the piston travels through the HX to the brew group, you will suffer loss in pressure. Keeping the HX loop to the group as short as possible is an mportant consideration.

I am sure someone much smarter than I can dig up the calculation faster than I. ( I used to be a fire fighter and it was of paramaount importance to have a pump operator deliver effective pressure several hundred feet away from the truck- hence probably one of you smart fellows with the "calculation aforementioned :wink: )

greg
greg moore

Leverwright
http://respresso.com/
LMWDP #067
User avatar
mogogear
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: NEPDX

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by espressme on Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:33 pm

mogogear wrote:Only a word of "friction loss" caution! As the pressure you exert at the piston travels through the HX to the brew group, you will suffer loss in pressure. Keeping the HX loop to the group as short as possible is an mportant consideration.
I am sure someone much smarter than I can dig up the calculation faster than I. ( I used to be a fire fighter and it was of paramaount importance to have a pump operator deliver effective pressure several hundred feet away from the truck- hence probably one of you smart fellows with the "calculation aforementioned :wink: )
greg

Thanks Greg, Good point. Large short lines and few restrictions.
The best to you, family and the new twins!
Richard
richard penney LMWDP #090,
User avatar
espressme
 
Posts: 885
Joined: May 31, 2006
Location: Menomonie,WI

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by timo888 on Thu Dec 07, 2006 3:43 pm

espressme wrote:Thanks Greg, Good point. Large short lines and few restrictions.
The best to you, family and the new twins!
Richard


For a moment there, I thought I'd missed an important birth announcement :shock:
Regards
Timo
P.S. I hope there are many orders of magnitude of difference in friction between hundreds of feet of rubber-lined fire hose and a few inches of smooth passivated stainless steel.
User avatar
timo888
 
Posts: 1945
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Location: Pennsylvania

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by hbuchtel on Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:39 pm

I updated the first page and added some links.

re HX tube length- after asking around and doing some reading ... I still don't know very much! Here is one example, Ben added 3 oz worth of tubing (length? diameter?) to his HX and did not see any difference. But this is with a rotary pump + flow restrictor.

Another example, Keith put his vibe pump 4 feet under the machine and added several loops around the boiler, experienced problems until 'upgrading' to a rotary pump.

Richard, I saw you said you've got an HX machine now, please post any relevant revelations here!

Henry
LMWDP #53
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by mogogear on Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:56 pm

timo888 wrote:P.S. I hope there are many orders of magnitude of difference in friction between hundreds of feet of rubber-lined fire hose and a few inches of smooth passivated stainless steel.


There WILL hopefully be a great difference, but also think about this additional effect:
*Pressure exerted at one end of an HX line
*Transmitted through the line
*Then it exits line through a "shower head " -I assume
*The Shower head opens into a larger space ( area above puck) that has to be filled and then pressurized to extraction pressure.
*The lag and drop in pressure in the final part of the pump stroke could leave very soupy pucks that are sneeze prone.

My antennae are twitching after seeing the sensitivity of shot profiles demonstrated to us by Alchemist and Great Dane.

Just playing devils advocate even though I like the HX thought Henry!!
greg moore

Leverwright
http://respresso.com/
LMWDP #067
User avatar
mogogear
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: NEPDX

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by hbuchtel on Sat Dec 09, 2006 11:38 pm

mogogear wrote:There WILL hopefully be a great difference, but also think about this additional effect:
*Pressure exerted at one end of an HX line
*Transmitted through the line
*Then it exits line through a "shower head " -I assume
*The Shower head opens into a larger space ( area above puck) that has to be filled and then pressurized to extraction pressure.
*The lag and drop in pressure in the final part of the pump stroke could leave very soupy pucks that are sneeze prone.

My antennae are twitching after seeing the sensitivity of shot profiles demonstrated to us by Alchemist and Great Dane.

Just playing devils advocate even though I like the HX thought Henry!!


Devils advocate good!

I asked Dave if the Achille (with its HX tube between the piston and puck) felt 'mushy,' he replied that it felt the same as his Factory and the other levers he had tried. I really enjoy 'feeling' the flow on the Caravel, hopefully this design will offer as much feedback as the simple Caravel.

I'm curious about whether the Achille has 'soupy' pucks, or whether water drips from the HX line when the PF is off...

mogogear wrote:*The Shower head opens into a larger space ( area above puck) that has to be filled and then pressurized to extraction pressure.


Hopefully there is a group available which has minimal open space. I was originally hoping to buy the whole Achille group and separate the dispersion block from the piston/chamber etc, but it seems that nobody is selling those parts yet!

Henry
LMWDP #53
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 545
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by mogogear on Sun Dec 10, 2006 1:42 am

Don't buy the group- buy the machine........ family guy!!!
greg moore

Leverwright
http://respresso.com/
LMWDP #067
User avatar
mogogear
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Feb 20, 2006
Location: NEPDX

Re: HX machine

Link to "Conti marries Achille"by espressme on Sun Dec 10, 2006 3:39 pm

hbuchtel wrote:Richard, I saw you said you've got an HX machine now, please post any relevant revelations here!
Henry

Hello Henry,
I own but do not yet possess a Commercial Salvatore HX. It won't be here till after the Holidays. Then it needs a complete cleaning and refurb!
So, what I know I read in the papers! In the meantime I'm trying to get some other machines cleaned and re-gasketed. :wink:
Take Care
Richard / espressme
richard penney LMWDP #090,
User avatar
espressme
 
Posts: 885
Joined: May 31, 2006
Location: Menomonie,WI

Next

Return to Lever Espresso Machines