hbuchtel wrote:There was a big debate on coffeegeek.com about whether or not the aeropress makes espresso, right? Not sure exactly where it is, sorry!
I have used my Aeropress many times, and I really like it. It is the device of choice when we head out in the motorhome. All things considered (quality of beverage, ease of use, ease of cleaning, range of parameters) it is my favorite method of making coffee, second only to espresso. I have given three of them away as gifts, and everyone who uses it that I have spoken to really likes it as well. The coffee it produces is closer to press pot or moka pot coffee. The coffee is rich and has great body. The filters remove the sediment which is the greatest drawback of using a press pot. The lack of sediment also means that the bitterness it creates is also removed.
With that said, I have spoken to Alan, the inventor of the Aeropress (as well as the Aerobie flying/throwing ring) face to face on two or three occasions and have told him that the beverage is not espresso. It produces virtually no crema at all- more like a bit of foam like you get with a Senseo or such. Alan contends that using his method of analysis that the total dissolved solids in the coffee from the Aeropress match what is found in espresso quite closely.
My contention is that all the instruments you can carry cannot tell you what the beverage will taste like nor what it will feel like on the palate. The Aeropress coffee is delicious and a joy to drink, but it isn't espresso... IMO. There are probably more restrictions on what can be called "Catsup" than there are on espresso, so you could sell a special sock that you dip in hot water and call it an espresso maker- but calling it so doesn't make it so.