First off Malachi....thanks for taking the time to work with me on this....I really appreciate your time and expertise in this.
malachi wrote:OK
I was not aware you were using an auto version of the machine. More clarity here now...
Two things.
1 - flushing by volume is less effective than flushing by time. If you could do me a favor.... after the machine has sat idle, hit flush and time from the end of the water sputtering. Note that time. Repeat when you've pulled a shot or two. Let us know what those two times are. From the time and your boiler pressure setting, we can probably make a reasonable guess on brew temp.
I am not completely sure what you mean here. I have programmed my flush volume to end just as the sputtering stops after a long idle time at my current boiler pressure setting - it is currently progammed to flush about 4.5 oz. I have tried lower boiler settings, and then I would also just re-program the button to flush less (for example).
So is what you are asking is for me to do the following?:
- Let machine idle for some time....(let's say 20 minutes)
- Prepare the shot and hit flush button.
- Time from end of water sputtering until flush stops (but this will be zero as I have programmed the button to end right when sputtering stops).
- Prepare another shot, and then when ready hit the flush button.
- Since Hx will not be as overheated as before, the flush will be longer than needed, so record the time from when sputtering stops until flush ends?
- Repeat a couple times and document?
So, is what you are after the time that a programmed flush (in this case, 4.5oz or so), extends past the point where the sputtering stops? Or did I totally not understand your note?
What happened last night after getting things set up again (with my 30 hour old beans), was prepare my shot (machine had idled for a long time), hit the flush button (water dance just settles as the flush ends), counted "5 mississippi", and then pulled my shot. The shot was quite good actually, for the first time in a long time....not great, but good. I still have had better on my Silvia. But lots of rich thick crema and was quite drinkable. No "harsh" or acrid tones that have been common. But a short time later (about 2-3 minutes) I pulled another double to make my wife a cappa, and the horrible taste was back. That time, I manually flushed using the "*" button until the sputtering just stopped, counted "5 missisippi" and then pulled. Shot "looked" OK by appearance, but taste was very off.
malachi wrote:2 - your 2oz extraction... what is the total extraction time on those shots?
With my Rocky set to about "8 clicks" above the burr touching point, the 2 oz shot comes out at about 20-25 seconds. If I move my grinder up one notch, it decreases to about 15 seconds or even less if i keep my tamp constant. One tighter on the grinder, and it stalls if I keep my tamp constant. (Yeah I know...time to upgrade grinders for more control).
malachi wrote:I'm going to predict that you're going to see some issues when you use the naked portafilter. You'll probably be able to remedy these by switching from grinding by weight to dosing by volume and by working on distribution. Speaking of which... how do you distribute? Are you using a technique like the Schomer quadrant distribution or the Stockfleths Move or are you doing something less regimented? Also, you'll probably want to experiment with a two-stage tamp (light tamp to preserve distribution, hard tamp with no-weight polish to finish).
My son is a real video hound, so I will get him to record some of my shots, and I will post them to my WEB server so you can watch the results. I hope to convert the single spout PF to bottomless this weekend.
I am using a slightly less regimented routine, but more a combination of both I think. I push grinds into the emptier areas near the edges...roughly quadrant based, and then use a circular levelling. I will try some two level tamping as well and see what difference it makes.
Grant