I've become more busy with my two boys, so I'm not roasting as often anymore, but I'll try to answer your questions. Even here in NC the outside temps can be challenging for my small roaster, but the spring should see me getting busy again.
Answers briefly:
1. Because in the case of the sul and the nic, they have approx the same density and they roast at about the same rate and finish at about the same roast level, which is what I want. In the case of the brazil and yemen I want a finish at different roast levels; the yemen will roast substantially slower, so it will finish at a much lighter and fruitier roast while the brazil is nice and chocolaty.
2. Because I like them. Simple as that. I've done many dozen different blends, and found many that I like. The only way to learn is by doing, and you'll find your favorites too.
3. Yes. The nature of the greens. You really just have to learn through experimentation.
4. I never cup, it is pointless to do anything in isolation. However, I suggest only changing one variable at a time. For example, my accent bean might be Harrar, and I'll decide that it might be causing a bitter edge, so I'll swap in a Yemen to see if my theory is right. Many times I tweak blends for taste or changing greens by swapping a green, or altering a percentage.
unidonburi wrote:Thanks for the article Mike,
I am curious to know how you chose to roast the 2 types of beans at the same.
Why the Brazil/Yemen and Sulawesi/Nicaragua?
do you change the combinations with different batches of green beans?
What is the basis for this choice?
do you ever use cupping to inform your roasting? or do you just experiment with blends?
cheers,
geoff