www.ajcoffeeco.com: excellent coffee without compromise

Warm up time for HX espresso machine

Postby kamali on Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:38 am

I have a Giotto Premium and I have it on timer in the morning.

In afternoon or late morning I turn it back on and it takes about 5-10 minutes to get to 1 bar of pressure (original setting). is it ok for longevity of the machine to start using as soon as it hits 1 bar of pressure? Or should I be waiting longer?
kamali
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Aug 17, 2010
Location: Great Neck, NY

Postby HB on Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:00 am

The steam boiler may pressurize in 10 minutes, but the thermosyphon takes at least another 15 minutes to heat the grouphead. The whole group (boiler, thermosyphon, grouphead, portafilter, and misc. bits of metal) isn't truly temperature stable for 40-60 minutes, depending on how aggressively the thermosyphon circuit cycles water between the steam boiler and grouphead.

How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love HXs explains in greater detail. You can "cheat" by flushing a few times during warmup, but realistically 25 minutes for an E61 / HX is the absolutely minimum warmup time and I recommend 45+ minutes.
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 13168
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Postby boar_d_laze on Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:36 am

+1.

Dan's post is so right it deserves amplification.

BDL
boar_d_laze
 
Posts: 447
Joined: Jun 04, 2007
Location: Monrovia, CA

Postby kamali on Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:25 pm

.
HB wrote:The steam boiler may pressurize in 10 minutes, but the thermosyphon takes at least another 15 minutes to heat the grouphead. The whole group (boiler, thermosyphon, grouphead, portafilter, and misc. bits of metal) isn't truly temperature stable for 40-60 minutes, depending on how aggressively the thermosyphon circuit cycles water between the steam boiler and grouphead..


Hi Dan

Yes I have read that before, but always good to re-read it. Lets say you turned off the machine at 9 am (timer) and you turn it back on 30 minutes later would this minimize the time for heat up?

If not I see why people leave the machine on all day, which I probably will in future.

Is there anyway to know when grouphead is heated (without buying an expensive adapter)? Possibly checking temperature of the shot?
kamali
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Aug 17, 2010
Location: Great Neck, NY

Postby HB on Sun Nov 27, 2011 1:32 pm

kamali wrote:Lets say you turned off the machine at 9 am (timer) and you turn it back on 30 minutes later would this minimize the time for heat up?

It takes a good two hours to cool down, so naturally turning it back on before it cools completely reduces the warmup time. As a rule of thumb, I keep an espresso machine on if it will be used within the next four hours, otherwise I turn it off. The question of whether to leave an espresso machine on 24 hours comes up frequently (e.g., Leave it on, or turn it off?).

kamali wrote:Is there anyway to know when grouphead is heated (without buying an expensive adapter)? Possibly checking temperature of the shot?

Brush your hand against the grouphead. It should be around 185°F, or enough to make you pull your finger back quickly, but not enough to make you cry out in pain. :lol:

PS: For the benefit of those who haven't read a previous "leave it on, leave it off?" debates, here's a short primer:

HB wrote:This question comes up regularly and the FAQ points to several past discussions: Running an espresso machine 24/7, Electricity Usage Monitor, actual consumption (CoffeeGeek), and a poll.

My take on it from last time:

I can appreciate the convenience of always-on espresso machines, especially for commercial units that demand hours to stabilize. But I've still not heard any compelling evidence tying premature component failures to on/off cycling. Simply put: What components are more likely to fail if a machine is run four hours a day versus 24/7?

In past discussions, I've read the following disadvantages of on/off cycling:
  • Inconvenient if one must wait, or added expense if one buys a timer; risk that machines without auto-refill with be turned on without water and burn out the heating element; risk that brew switch will be inadvertently be left in on position and burn out pump when timer starts it
  • Increases scale build-up at the boiler's waterline
  • "Stresses" connections of dissimilar metals (How does this manifest itself as a failure - boiler leaks? If so, from where?)
  • Electronic components are subjected to changing temperatures, which increases the likelihood of them failing. The argument that failures are more common with frequently cycled computers is often cited in the same context
  • Sensitive electronic components are subjected to electrical spikes when machine is turned on/off
I've read the following advantages of on/off cycling:
  • Saves energy
  • Increases the lifespan of gaskets
  • Reduced usage decreases pressurestat's carbon buildup, which is the leading cause of failure
  • Some "weaker" connections are made of nylon or plastic (tees, insulators). Exposure to less heat reduces their failure rates
  • Reduced exposure to high temperatures increases the lifespan of sensitive electronic components like controllers (note: applies mostly to prosumer / semi-commercial machines; they are located outside of the case of most commercial units)
Looking at the list above, the one that sticks out for me is the pressurestat. They cost around $40-$60. If I remember correctly, that roughly equates to the added energy cost of approximately two years' 24/7 operation. It wouldn't surprise me if 24/7 operation would decrease some pressurestat's lifespan by that much (e.g., CEME, MATER).

The calculations for a cafe are a lot easier. If the cafe closes at 10pm and reopens around 6am, realistically they have little choice but to run 24/7. For those with machines that warm up in 30-60 minutes, it's an option. Is on/off cycling a more economical option? I don't know for certain, but my guess is yes, it is for most prosumer / semi-commercial units.

And Andy's insight in support of the above:

AndyS wrote:Turning the machine off overnight will always save electricity, no matter what size it is. People who say "it takes more electricity to warm it back up than you save by turning it off" are incorrect.

There are two caveats:
1. The amount of electricity saved may be quite low, as Mike says.
2. Some people claim that certain machine components (eg, gaskets) last longer when the machine is on 24/7. (Unfortunately, many of these people are probably just repeating anecdotal evidence that does not constitute real proof. One would think that the major machine manufacturers have a lot of good data on this, though.)

For more details, see one of the more thorough discussions of this frequently asked question below:

As a noteworthy side note, Brian Ludviksen at Counter Culture Coffee is trying a "green experiment" by having their 3-group La Marzocco Strada cycle off on weekends and after hours during the week. I run my 2-group the same way (i.e., on at 6am and turned off manually most days, otherwise automatically at 6pm). After a year or two, we'll compare notes on longer-term failure rates.
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 13168
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Postby kamali on Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:52 pm

Thanks Dan

I think I like your rule of leaving it on if I plan on making espresso within 4 hours (as long as someone is home)
kamali
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Aug 17, 2010
Location: Great Neck, NY

Postby spiffdude on Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:09 pm

Wow this thread has all the relevant links, great work Dan.

I have a Rocket Evoluzione and it takes 60 minutes to come up to full temp and behave in a stable manner. Pstat set at factory 1.1 bar max. I've used it at the 30 minute mark and it just isn't ready yet: sour shots and sloooooow recovery
Damn this forum, I've had too m..muh...mah..mmmm..much caffeine!
User avatar
spiffdude
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Montreal, Canada

Postby erics on Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:41 pm

Warm-up time for a current Rocket machine and cool-down for a Quickmill Anita. Cool-downs would be similar but not identical.

Image

Image
Skål,

Eric S.
http://users.rcn.com/erics/
E-mail: erics at erols dot com
User avatar
erics
 
Posts: 2986
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD

Postby cannonfodder on Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:27 am

I broke out the VBM Domobar Super a few days ago. I have a group head thermometer in it. It takes a solid 45 min for the group to get up to 205 which is where it stabilizes. I usually give it an hour to heat and stabilize, my A3 is much larger and takes more like an hour and a half but it stays on unless I am out of town.
Dave Stephens
User avatar
cannonfodder
Team HB
 
Posts: 6812
Joined: May 23, 2005
Location: Downingtown PA

Postby spiffdude on Mon Nov 28, 2011 9:26 am

Cool graph Eric. Thanks! That confirms the reading on my thermometer.
Damn this forum, I've had too m..muh...mah..mmmm..much caffeine!
User avatar
spiffdude
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Sep 26, 2010
Location: Montreal, Canada

Next

Return to Espresso Machines