HB wrote:my gut feeling is that the holy grail of absolute temperature repeatability is more of an engineering exercise or commercial interest than something Joe/Jane home barista needs to worry about. Assuming, of course, that their end goal is exceptional espresso versus bragging rights about owning the "baddest" hardware.
Very well said Dan. And it's also agreed that a minimal amount of futzing is all that's required of any prosumer PID/DB machine even under the most demanding home barista conditions
So - again it seems that it becomes a matter of how we want to define "league" and then just how important is the "league" of temp stability shot-to-shot.
When I got my own GS3 I did some unscientific comparisons using both machines side by side and found I was able to generate very similar cups with saturated vs. E61 HX. Sure, the flavor and texture profiles of the straight shots were slightly different but most folks I know would be hard-pressed to say which was "better" (it would come down to a matter of prefernce rather than absolute quality in the cup).
I didn't buy the GS3 primarily for flat-line temp stability or 0.1 °C repeatability, it was more for *bling factor*, and the ease of use, stronger steam, and ability to more easily experiment with different temperature settings for different coffees (and geeeeez - the steampower is lovely!).
Bottom line, it is more precise and consistent than the HX and I think there is an overall improvement in my cup as a result...but it was the coolness factor and the "Premier" status of the saturated group that sold me (I still would not have gone for it at the original sales price)




