Rancilio Silvia & Auber PID - Steam Control or No? - Page 5

Need help with equipment usage or want to share your latest discovery?
Endo
Posts: 337
Joined: 16 years ago

#41: Post by Endo »

Hmmmm. Can't see that working too well.

I would tend to think that your normal +10C grouphead temp offset would be screwed up using this method.

I'm guessing the boiler might read cool (due to the cold water injection) but the brew head would still be too warm from the higher steam temp.
"Disclaimer: All troll-like comments are my way of discussing"

User avatar
HB
Admin
Posts: 22031
Joined: 19 years ago

#42: Post by HB »

o3 wrote:I flush afterwards twice to get back down to temp. Is it always better to pull first then steam?
Unfortunately this raises the brew first/steam first debate.

If you must flush twice to get to brew temperature, you defeat the purpose of having a PID. That is, the overall group temperature (grouphead, boiler, plumbing bits, etc.) takes awhile to stabilize. For steaming, it's no big deal if the boiler temperature is off by 3 degrees. But for brewing, it's a big deal if the group temperature is off by 3 degrees. By steaming first and flushing to return to brew temperature, the chances of consistently hitting the desired temperature in the brew chamber are small, despite what the PID readout may indicate for the boiler temperature.
Dan Kehn

Advertisement
User avatar
blueface
Posts: 114
Joined: 15 years ago

#43: Post by blueface »

For Rancilio Silvia, the sequence should be brewing first then steaming, right?

User avatar
HB
Admin
Posts: 22031
Joined: 19 years ago

#44: Post by HB »

Yes, I recommend brew first and then steam.

For the longer answer, see discussions like Poor espresso has to wait for milk and How long do you allow your espresso to sit before adding milk? Whichever you choose - brew or steam first - there's a tradeoff.
Dan Kehn

Post Reply