Marshall wrote:...What I am calling out here is the assumption that other people are clueless incompetents, based on precious little information.
I agree. There is a big difference between ignorant and incompetence. I would have a lot more respect for a tech that would tell me they do not have experience with that group so would not work on it than I would with a tech that says, "Sure, I'll take a look and see what I can do."
"HEY TONY! Bring me my big hammer!"
When I taught 6th grade, I would have students occasionally ask me a question to which I did not have an answer. I would respond, "I don't know." Then I would ask them, "Do you know what percentage of teachers are honest enough to say I don't know?"
"No, Mr. G. How many?"
"I don't know."
Right now, on my workbench, I have a fairly-well disassembled Vibiemme DS to have the main frame powder coated. I had no hesitation doing that because 1, it is a simple machine, and 2, I have experience and knowledge of the machine. Before seeing that video I would never have considered opening a GS/3. After seeing it I think it would be a simple job, as I mentioned before. I would also use better tools than shown in the video. An adjustable wrench on the top nut? I don't think so. He didn't even have it fully on the nut...
Use a jury-rigged tool to pull those parts out of a $6500 group? I don't think so. As touchy as the O-rings can be (or at least as often as some owners report having to change them), why make things worse taking a chance at marring any of those surfaces. It just isn't worth the risk, and the tool makes the removal of all those parts simple. I would prefer to see the tool work as a puller instead of a slide hammer, but there you go.. LM didn't call me when they designed it,,
But I agree that if a tech sees that video and still does not feel comfortable working on that GS/3 group. I would find another tech as well.