by gyro on Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:33 pm
OK, so removing the gicleur has definitely changed things! All the needle flutter has disappeared (not that there was alot, but it was noticeable on the gauge), which is a little confusing as I'm not sure why that would happen.
Obviously the pre-infusion now really needs to be manually controlled, whereas before I was happy with the restrictor and pre-infusion chamber. Now the pre-infusion chamber (downstream of gicleur location) fills up really fast. Response rate to changes on the pot are quicker, as there is no lag effect from the gicleur.
The couple of shots I've pulled this morning have been a little harsh. I was setting 9 - 9.5 bar on the gauge, whereas beforehand I was probably getting 8.5 bar at the head. Hard to change my brain to want to see 8.5 on the gauge!
Pump has been working fine with no funny cavitation sounds that Nicholas experienced. Although as I mentioned in a previous post, I have heard a gurgling sound on occasion if just 'pre-infusing'. Its my belief that the TMFR doesn't allow the flow through of water when not rotating as well as some other rotary pumps. I think it may depend on exactly where in the rotation cycle the vanes stop at as well, as its not always the same.
If I was to process control the pump, this current gicleur-less set-up would be the configuration in which I would do it. Still not convinced that I want to spend the coin on it. The occasional auto-fill (when its not meant to) screws the shot, although this would be mitigated if under process control as the controller would up the RPM to try and maintain pressure.
The fiddler in me wants to automate it, or at least change the manual control to pressure (vs RPM) but the bean counter (I'm not an accountant!) in me says its not worth it.
Cheers, Chris