www.greatinfusions.com: espresso cups and barista gear, showroom in Santa Cruz

Pressure profiles, preinfusion and the forgiveness factor - Page 4

Postby malachi on Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:32 pm

lino wrote:That also sure looks like the hard way to load the PF handle...



I totally missed that at first! Very funny. Wonder if the drawing was done by one of the folks in the ESI parts dept...
"Taste is the only morality." -- John Ruskin
malachi
 
Posts: 2614
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: sfca

Postby lennoncs on Fri Jan 06, 2006 1:38 pm

malachi wrote:...Wonder if the drawing was done by one of the folks in the ESI parts dept...


When I had a patent drawing done, the drawing conventions set forth by the patent office are still based on pen and ink illustrations done 100 years ago....it was so bizzare seeing a modern carbon fiber part rendered in that way.
lennoncs
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
Location: Davisburg, Michigan

Postby hbuchtel on Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:04 pm

Dan, would it be possible to hook up all this equipment to your Lever machine?

It would be really interesting to compare the ramp up of pressure to the other types of pumps.

Henry
User avatar
hbuchtel
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Jun 22, 2005
Location: Changsha, Hunan (or A2, MI, USA)

Postby HB on Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:16 pm

Lino and I have discussed this possibility for his Peppina since it has all the requisite fittings:

Image
From Has anyone ever PID'd a lever machine?

Measuring the ramp up pressure of a lever machine against a blank portafilter would only be mildly interesting (I would expect to see an initial pressure around the same as the boiler pressure, then nearly straight up to max pressure). Neither Steve nor I have volunteered to tap the grouphead our respective Olympia Cremina / Elektra Microcasa a Leva in the search of the truth, however he did offer a close approximation in Olympia Cremina 2002: The evolution of design using an ordinary bathroom scale:

Image

Of course this trick wouldn't work for the Microcasa, but presumably one could guesstimate the pressure profile by measuring the brew pressure at the top and bottom of the spring's travel. As I recall Lino's mechanical calculation, the Microcasa's spring is capable of putting out around 6 bar and tapers off to around 4 bar. A lot less than I would have expected.
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 13168
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Postby Jepy on Wed Jan 18, 2006 1:42 pm

I've been using this as my at the group pressure reader. Not a cheap gauge, but worth it, as I 've measure some of the quality cafes around here and seen that the Marzocco gauges are reading higher than this devise. Which brings up another point. As we get more and more into pressure profiling, and studies, when can we do away with the "Bar" measurement? Or at least use it after reading in PSI first. 14.7 PSI per Bar, just a whole lot easier to read small amounts.

John

Image
User avatar
Jepy
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Location: Bay Area

Postby barry on Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:34 pm

Jepy wrote: 14.7 PSI per Bar, just a whole lot easier to read small amounts.



nope. 14.508 psi/bar
User avatar
barry
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: St Louis, MO
prima-coffee.com: coffee & espresso equipment and accessories
prima-coffee.com: coffee & espresso equipment and accessories

Postby Jepy on Wed Jan 18, 2006 4:59 pm

barry wrote:nope. 14.508 psi/bar


Oops, sorry. I guess I should proof read, You get my point though, smaller increments....
User avatar
Jepy
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Location: Bay Area

Postby AndyS on Wed Jan 18, 2006 7:30 pm

Jepy wrote:Oops, sorry. I guess I should proof read, You get my point though, smaller increments....


Don't get your point. Who cares whether the measurement is 134 psi or 9.24 bar? Since everyone's been using "bar" for years, why change now?


Image


(image of Mirage Idrocompresso)
-AndyS
VST refractometer/filter basket beta tester, no financial interest in the company
User avatar
AndyS
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: NY

Postby Jepy on Thu Jan 19, 2006 3:14 am

It's not that I care what the numbers are 134 Vs 9.24(grey arrows), visually it's easier to read from the gauges I've found. I've been profiling my pressure for a while now, and seen how different coffees sweet spots can differ if only slightly. For example(subjective of course)Hairbender, pre-infusion 19 psi top pressure of 127psi Vs. Lighthouse Roasters Espresso blend pre-infusion again at 19psi, but tops out at 122. Both of these also have a ramp down pressure.

The pictured gauges are of similar pressure ranges, all marks should be roughly the same. What would you rather be reading from? I've cataloged quite a bit of data on different profiles for different blends, and wouldn't go back to bar myself. Next I'll be using the computer to data log, but still like to have the analog visual of my gauges.

John

Image
User avatar
Jepy
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Aug 16, 2005
Location: Bay Area

Postby battlecry on Tue Jan 24, 2006 11:29 am

I just finished installing a (wet) pressure gauge on the Silvia with a few loops of copper tubing to reduce the line pressure variations and provide some thermal isolation for the gauge. It hit me that, except for the thermal isolation and protection of the gauge, maybe I should have installed the copper coil just downstream of the pump, before the boiler, so as to provide a damping effect to the complete brew apparatus, not just the gauge.

Would such a coil, or perhaps a water-hammer type damper, provide a steadier pressure rampup and brewing pressure profile?
???
battlecry
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Jan 11, 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD

PreviousNext

Return to Espresso Machines