www.caffefresco.us: passion · purity · people

Love lattes, not so much espresso shots - Page 2

Need help with equipment usage or want to share your latest discovery?

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by miKe mcKoffee on Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:35 am

Marshall wrote:I think what you are planning will be a big waste of money and a lot of aggravation for you. I doubt there is anyone on this board who could tell how good the espresso was in "12 oz. of sweet steamed milk."

I respectfully disagree. While I don't drink double shot 12oz lattes I do sample them periodically at my cafe and guarantee can tell the difference if the shot good or bad. Yet of course not as glaringly as with a straight shot.

FWIW a double shot 12oz latte is very similar in ratio to a traditional Italian single shot breakfast cappuccino, of course the latte with less dense micro-foam.
aka Mike McGinness
www.norwestcoffee.com
miKe mcKoffee
 
Posts: 1207
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA, USA

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by uscfroadie on Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:04 am

RapidCoffee wrote:Well, there you have it. For lattes, the experts at H-B recommend that you get one of the following machines:

1) single boiler (with PID no less)

As an originator of this idea, I wanted to defend myself by mentioning that I STRONGLY stressed the need for an alternate method of steaming milk, if going with the single boiler option.


I'm sorry, but I have to ask, wouldn't the OP be better off with something like an Expobar Brewtus as opposed to say an Alexia w/PID and a separate milk frothing device? When totaled up they'd cost the same, but the Expobar would take up less space on the counter.
Merle
LMWDP #273
User avatar
uscfroadie
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Oct 26, 2007
Location: Utah

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by rharlow on Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:09 am

Two things I've learned from posting to this forum...
* First, you are all exceptional people (at least in internet land). Seriously, the feedback you've provided has been great.
* Second, I will never come between a home-barista forum poster and their coffee. I value my appendages too much.

I like the direction the posts have taken since @Marshall highlighted that 2 shots of 'decent' espresso mixed in 12 oz. of milk is really all I'm looking for. Lattes will be 99% of what my wife and I will drink using our new machine.

In the end, I will avoid "buyers remorse" if I can pull 2 shots of espresso and steam 12 oz. of milk within, both of good quality (not necessarily great quality) within 3 or 4 minutes and REPEAT. All for under $1,500.
User avatar
rharlow
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 18, 2008
Location: Allegan, MI

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by shadowfax on Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:18 pm

rharlow wrote:In the end, I will avoid "buyers remorse" if I can pull 2 shots of espresso and steam 12 oz. of milk within, both of good quality (not necessarily great quality) within 3 or 4 minutes and REPEAT. All for under $1,500.


Here is the trouble with the internet: We all have different tastes for what is "good" and "great." Marshall suggests you won't notice much in 12 oz. of milk--to the extent that he suggests stale coffee (pods). I have never tried pod lattés, so I can't say for sure. However, true story: I was in St. Louis, and I entered the sham of a coffee shop that is Kayak's Coffee. From the window, I had seen that they had a LM Linea, and a LM Swift. This was encouraging to me (these are nice machines, usually too expensive for people that don't know poop from coffee beans), so I went in to order. I looked at the menu, and this was the first sign of something horridly awry: The cappuccino came in 3 sizes: 12 oz, 16 oz, and 20 oz. Hmm, that's funny, none of those sizes corresponds to a cappuccino. Well, I don't know why I did it, but I ordered a small cappuccino. What I received was a 12 oz. drink in a to go cup (to hide the crap foam job). I drank it, and I guess at first it didn't make me wish death upon myself, but by a few more sips I was feeling ill. This was some of the worst coffee I could remember! In 12 oz. of milk! By this time, my friends and I had driven to the other side of Washington University, and we were at Kaldi's Coffee shop. I poured the remainder of my 12 oz. of trash out into a drain, and threw my cup away, ashamed to bring it into the shop. We went in, and I got a real cappuccino (From a Robur, GB5, and a guy that had much more than just a clue), and it was excellent. My friend's latté was also superb.

I have no idea where your taste buds are, but I am with Mike: You aren't going to make good lattés with bad coffee. 12 oz. of milk will hide plenty of mistakes, but it's not going to hide stale coffee. Now, if you have a taste for bitter, black coffee, you may enjoy it. But it won't be what most of us would consider great coffee, and I can all but guarantee you that if you learned to make a decent shot of espresso from fresh, pro-roasted beans, with a good grinder like the Vario, and a decent espresso machine, you will enjoy your lattés more. They will be a lot better than pod lattés and pre-ground coffee lattés in the best way: they will actually have a candy taste to them, be that a "ripe fruit" milkshake, or a "chocolate hazelnut" milkshake, depending on the beans you use (note: they still do taste like coffee ;)). With pod or preground, you're going to get a bitter-coffee flavored milkshake. It won't overwhelm your palate the way a bad espresso would, but I don't think it will be anything like good after you've tried good lattés.

That's just my opinion, of course, take it for what you may. If your budget really is $1500, I would echo the suggestion for a HX machine--learn to flush till the sputtering stops + a few seconds before making your shot, and you will make perfectly good espresso to have a very nice latté. Occasionally, the stars will align, and you will make a great espresso, and it will still be awesome in a latté. I think the Vario grinder you were considering would also be a good choice for starters--it will be small and tidy, and highly usable.
Nicholas Lundgaard
User avatar
shadowfax
 
Posts: 2198
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Houston, TX

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by shadowfax on Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:20 pm

uscfroadie wrote:I'm sorry, but I have to ask, wouldn't the OP be better off with something like an Expobar Brewtus as opposed to say an Alexia w/PID and a separate milk frothing device? When totalled up they'd cost the same, but the Expobar would take up less space on the counter.

That's purely a matter of taste. I would prefer the HX, myself, but I could see the convenience value of a separate frother, since it makes it trivially easy to get decent foam.
Nicholas Lundgaard
User avatar
shadowfax
 
Posts: 2198
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Houston, TX

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by HB on Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:39 pm

shadowfax wrote:I have no idea where your taste buds are, but I am with Mike: You aren't going to make good lattés with bad coffee. 12 oz. of milk will hide plenty of mistakes, but it's not going to hide stale coffee. Now, if you have a taste for bitter, black coffee, you may enjoy it. But it won't be what most of us would consider great coffee...

If all you've had all your life is McDonad's food, then more of the same will go down nicely. But once you've experienced food prepared by a skilled chef, the good 'ol Big Mac doesn't taste as good as it did. I have friends who were diehard Starbucks fans; their taste for the Green Mermaid was "ruined" when I served them a genuine cappuccino made with Intelligentsia's coffee.

rharlow wrote:In the end, I will avoid "buyers remorse" if I can pull 2 shots of espresso and steam 12 oz. of milk within, both of good quality (not necessarily great quality) within 3 or 4 minutes and REPEAT. All for under $1,500.

Or enter the Wish List Gifts contest and potentially cut your outlay in half (Mazzer Mini Electronic, Le'Lit PL53, Compak K3 Touch and Baratza Vario are among the prizes). :D
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 9900
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by Marshall on Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:51 pm

shadowfax wrote:Marshall suggests you won't notice much in 12 oz. of milk--to the extent that he suggests stale coffee (pods). I have never tried pod lattés, so I can't say for sure.

By using the single word "stale," without gradation, you have equated all pods with coffee left in a bag (or worse) for a month. In fact there is great variation among pods in the quality of coffee used, how they are structured, preserved and sealed. I suggested the Nespresso because it is one of the better systems, uses better coffee than most (actually some quite good coffees are available) and, particularly with milk and sweetener, passes most people's taste test. It is wildly popular in Europe. How stale does this look to you: http://www.airtightinteractive.com/news/?p=163? :D

shadowfax wrote:However, true story: I was in St. Louis, and I entered the sham of a coffee shop that is Kayak's Coffee. ... What I received was a 12 oz. drink in a to go cup (to hide the crap foam job).

Unfortunately, this tells us nothing about how the coffee would have tasted in a good foam job.

I was not suggesting the OP combine "stale coffee" with "crap foam." I was suggesting he use well-preserved coffee from one of the better capsule systems with naturally sweet, well-made foam. It's not what I would drink, but when people ask for advice, I try to advise them based on their own preferences, rather than mine.
Marshall
Los Angeles
User avatar
Marshall
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: May 13, 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by shadowfax on Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:02 pm

Marshall: that's fair enough. The Nespresso looks like it'd be worth the look. I'd still say that an HX and a simple flush routine, while more work, would get you better espresso than any pod most of the time, with blips of awfulness (dialing in) and blips of greatness (stars align sort of thing). But, if you're into coffee, but not into it like us (many of us probably ought to consider spending some of our coffee money on a psychiatrist, right?), Nespresso may well be worth a look.

One advantage of Nespresso is that I'll bet any money that you can find a retailer that will let you sample the goods... I would suggest doing this before spending the money. I think they have these pod systems available to sample at my local Williams Sonoma... I'll have to check it out now.
Nicholas Lundgaard
User avatar
shadowfax
 
Posts: 2198
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Houston, TX

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by howard seth on Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:42 pm

I have served lattes, made on my Elektra Semiautomatica, using fresh home roasted beans and 1% milk - to the occasional guest that comes to my place - not coffee aficionado types - and I have seen their eyes widen, and then the comment - This is the best coffee I have ever had! They seem to mean it. This suggests to me that the "average" person has no trouble discerning the difference between stale second rate coffee drink, and a fresh decently made cup - if given the opportunity.

Howard
Howard Seth Miller
http://howseth.com
howard seth
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Location: Santa Cruz County, California

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by cafeIKE on Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:49 pm

Amen
User avatar
cafeIKE
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by Marshall on Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:58 pm

howard seth wrote: This suggests to me that the "average" person has no trouble discerning the difference between stale second rate coffee drink, and a fresh decently made cup - if given the opportunity.

So true. We should all avoid second rate stale coffee in favor of a decently made cup. By the way, did you serve the drinks in 12 oz of milk?
Marshall
Los Angeles
User avatar
Marshall
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: May 13, 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by howard seth on Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:20 pm

Did I ever serve the lattes in 12 oz of milk? No. The extreme volume of milk would not have gone past 8 oz - generally less. Otherwise I would have been serving steamed/foamed milk with a hint of coffee essence.

Howard
Howard Seth Miller
http://howseth.com
howard seth
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Aug 11, 2006
Location: Santa Cruz County, California

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by Marshall on Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:55 pm

howard seth wrote:Did I ever serve the lattes in 12 oz of milk? No. The extreme volume of milk would not have gone past 8 oz - generally less. Otherwise I would have been serving steamed/foamed milk with a hint of coffee essence.

Q.E.D.
Marshall
Los Angeles
User avatar
Marshall
 
Posts: 1132
Joined: May 13, 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by cafeIKE on Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:09 pm

I serve singles w about 6oz of foam because that's what the missus likes.

Guest response is identical to Howard's
User avatar
cafeIKE
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by cafeIKE on Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:21 pm

shadowfax wrote:Marshall: that's fair enough. The Nespresso looks like it'd be worth the look. I'd still say that an HX and a simple flush routine, while more work, would get you better espresso than any pod most of the time, with blips of awfulness (dialing in) and blips of greatness (stars align sort of thing). But, if you're into coffee, but not into it like us (many of us probably ought to consider spending some of our coffee money on a psychiatrist, right?), Nespresso may well be worth a look.

One advantage of Nespresso is that I'll bet any money that you can find a retailer that will let you sample the goods... I would suggest doing this before spending the money. I think they have these pod systems available to sample at my local Williams Sonoma... I'll have to check it out now.

Just returned from an isolated mini break over the Thanksgiving weekend with family and friends. An informal poll of *$ and lesser coffee drinkers all gave thumbs down.

Consistent and convenient, but woefully lacking any resemblance to espresso.
User avatar
cafeIKE
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Woodland Hills, CA

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by rharlow on Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:48 pm

Thanks for the Thanksgiving "real world" feedback! It helped support the decision I made over the holiday weekend.

I'd would now like to formally announce my decision.
drum roll please...
envelope...
step up to the mic...
(sound of tearing paper)

I have chosen to go with the La Spaziale Mini Vivaldi II.
Image
Now I just have to figure out what grinder will best compliment my soon to be purchased personal latte factory.

Thanks again to everyone in this forum who took the time to post your thoughts.
User avatar
rharlow
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 18, 2008
Location: Allegan, MI

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by JohnB. on Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:52 pm

rharlow wrote:
I have chosen to go with the La Spaziale Mini Vivaldi II.


Excellent choice! :D
LMWDP 267
User avatar
JohnB.
 
Posts: 590
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Location: northeastern Ct.

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by Bushrod on Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:56 pm

WINNER!

Call Chris's Coffee and see what kind of deal you can get...
Rich A

LMWDP #131
User avatar
Bushrod
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Feb 21, 2007
Location: Alexandria, VA

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by clumeng on Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:11 pm

rharlow wrote:Now I just have to figure out what grinder will best compliment my soon to be purchased personal latte factory.


If you are trying to stick to a budget (that you already shot with the Mini) there are frequently used Mazzer Super Jollys or Majors for sale on Ebay for $300-500. Usually can find a deal and with a purchase of new burrs have a great stepless grinder that would be perfect for the Mini. I just picked up an SJ for $250 and the difference vs my Rocky is really interesting actually. The Baratza Vario is very very interesting as well but doesn't have the track record as the Mazzers. If the Mazzer breaks down you'll have lots of help online.
clumeng
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Jun 01, 2008
Location: Michigan

Link to "Love lattes, not so much espresso shots"by rharlow on Thu Dec 04, 2008 11:53 am

clumeng wrote:I just picked up an SJ for $250


How long did it take you to find this kind of deal. Are they available "all the time" on ebay or do I have to watch the sales for a month or so? Just curious.
User avatar
rharlow
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Nov 18, 2008
Location: Allegan, MI

PreviousNext

Return to Espresso Machines