prima-coffee.com: coffee & espresso equipment and accessories

La Marzocco GS3 pressure ramp takes longer - Page 3

Postby Peppersass on Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:22 am

Ken Fox wrote:Just continue to dump water from the steam boiler via the tea spout until you are sure that the issue of accumulating minerals is a non-issue.


Tried that once. Takes forever. The tea water has a time limit (50 seconds, I think), just like the brew group. So you have to repeatedly press the tea water button until the boiler drains. Also, you have to set the Tea Water to PUMP OFF (default is PUMP ON.) Otherwise, it'll mix cold water with the water from the boiler and it'll take even longer to drain.

My conclusion is that the fastest and easiest way to drain the steam boiler is through the ball valve. I'd like to find a fitting for the ball valve threads so I can quickly attach a drain tube (I'm using the drain box tube with a hose clamp.) But I don't think the ball valve would take a standard fitting you could find in a US hardware store. It's close to 1/2", but not quite there. I need to get out the calipers and figure out whether there's a standard fitting that would work or a vinyl tube size that would fit snugly over the ball valve.

Ken Fox wrote:Then, you could drain the brew boiler via the group...


Same problem with having to repeatedly hit the continuous brew button. In this case as well, draining via the group takes a lot longer than opening the OPV.
Dick Green
User avatar
Peppersass
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Location: New Hampshire

Postby networkcrasher on Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:31 am

Peppersass wrote:My conclusion is that the fastest and easiest way to drain the steam boiler is through the ball valve. I'd like to find a fitting for the ball valve threads so I can quickly attach a drain tube (I'm using the drain box tube with a hose clamp.) But I don't think the ball valve would take a standard fitting you could find in a US hardware store. It's close to 1/2", but not quite there. I need to get out the calipers and figure out whether there's a standard fitting that would work or a vinyl tube size that would fit snugly over the ball valve.


I suppose you could just take the cap with you and try it out on some of the male counterparts at the store to see what you need...
User avatar
networkcrasher
 
Posts: 587
Joined: Jan 20, 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA

Postby Ken Fox on Sun Oct 04, 2009 11:23 am

It's not that hard to drain the steam boiler through the ball valve, using a plastic hose that is larger than the diameter of the fitting on the boiler (such as the drain hose that comes with the machine for use when it is plumbed in). You don't need to thread something on there for a connection that is going to last for a minute, if you have a receptacle or sink you can drain it into. If you have some of your LM drain hose available it will work fine, otherwise a visit to your local HD or Lowes will be fruitful.

I guess there is a limit to my compulsiveness, however. I'm never home for more than 3 months straight, and in the winter it is more like 4-6 weeks maximum. I'd be perfectly happy removing a large percentage of the water in the steam boiler, even if it is going to mix with fresh water and only be partially drained off, every couple of weeks. Since I know I will be draining the whole boiler regularly because when I'm not in town the machine is going to be drained completely and turned off, I don't have to do a 100% drainage every time I try to reduce the accumulation of minerals.

For me that means that I'd be quite satisfied with draining a liter or two from the tea spout every two weeks, and a few hundred ml out of the group head, especially since the brew water is constantly changing anyway because it is used in the preparation of every single espresso drink and flush that I perform.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Postby Peppersass on Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:34 am

There have been a few interesting developments in my GS/3 flow rate saga. Rather than repeat the whole story here, check my thread on the subject on Gs3cafe. Click Here for the latest post.

I should add that the original pressure ramp problem has been gone for some time. Even when the flow rate is down to the minimum 360 ml/min, pressure during a backflush ramps up quickly, usually within 3-4 seconds on the first backflush, then within 2 seconds on subsequent backflushes. The first drops of coffee are appearing in maybe 5 seconds or less, which is what happened when I first got the machine. This has been true for quite a while, so something I did along the way seems to have fixed that problem for good. However, the flow rate issue continues -- or does it?

Comments would be appreciated.
Dick Green
User avatar
Peppersass
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Location: New Hampshire

Postby erics on Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:05 pm

Contrary to the information I wrote in a previous post to this thread, the GS3 is equipped with a Fluid-O-Tech (FOT) 074 pump vice my thinking that it was a 054 pump. If you go to the FOT website - http://www.fluid-o-tech.com/files/Compact_e_Compact_Plus.pdf and look at the performance curve for this particular pump (the 074), you'll see that it is actually pumping 1500 ml/min at a discharge pressure of 9.0 bar. A SUBSTANTIAL portion of that flow is just "going around in circles" within the pump itself during flushing conditions and even more so during production of a typical double-shot.

What this shows is the contribution of the pump's bypass valve (amoungst other factors) during the course of any flow measurements. Hence my initial suggestion to remove/inspect the bypass valve for any obvious descrepancies.

In addition to this, there is no information provided by anyone as to how this flushing flowrate is being measured, i.e. are we using stopwatches, laboratory beakers, multiplying a 10 second water debit by 6, etc., etc. Everybody can be using different methods and providing intentionally honest numbers. Laboratory beakers are typically +/- 5%, the pumps themselves are probably +/- 5%, system restriction is probably +/- 5% - you get the picture :) . Most definitely, I believe that knowing your machine's flowrate during flushing is important and, once a reasonable, repeatable number is attained, it should be penciled in your book as an aid to future troubleshooting - hoping you never have to use it :)
Skål,

Eric S.
http://users.rcn.com/erics/
E-mail: erics at erols dot com
User avatar
erics
 
Posts: 2763
Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD

Postby Peppersass on Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:19 pm

Latest update: My flow rate problem has been solved, but not by fixing anything. After we tried just about everything short of disassembling the group head and replacing the feed tube, Chris Coffee replaced my GS/3 with a new one. The new machine consistently runs at about 450 ml/min.

Chris Coffee is, in my opinion, the best espresso equipment vendor in the universe. :D

For the technically inclined, some specifics follow.

erics wrote:What this shows is the contribution of the pump's bypass valve (amoungst other factors) during the course of any flow measurements. Hence my initial suggestion to remove/inspect the bypass valve for any obvious descrepancies.


After the low flow rate problem returned, I disassembled the bypass valve and inspected it. Nothing obvious wrong, but it would be difficult to know for sure if there was a defective spring or ill fitting part. At any rate, when I reassembled the valve, the flow rate was still low.

Chris Coffee then sent me a replacement pump, which included its own bypass valve. Replacing the pump had no effect on the flow rate. It remained at about 360 ml/min. I inspected the feed tube from the reservoir and the pump outlet tube, both of which were clear. This pretty much eliminated the water path from the tank to the tea water mixing valve.

I happened to plumb in the machine during this time, and this did not change the flow rate. But I didn't think it would.

We also tried a neat experiment devised by Chris Kramer to test John Blackwell's theory that a bad check valve on the tea water mixing valve was bypassing brew water into the steam boiler. We had discounted that theory because it seemed that there would be evidence such as changes in steam boiler pressure, reduced steam, etc. But I realized that the amount of water bypassed during one of my tests would be pretty small, on the order of 50-75 ml, not likely to noticeably reduce available steam. Also, my wife uses a lot of tea water, so the level in the steam boiler constantly gets reset throughout the day. Anyway, what I did was drain the steam boiler and disconnect the level probe and heater so that the boiler would be empty and not refill. Then I disconnected the tube that connects the suspect check valve to the steam boiler and hit the brew button. Not a single drop of water came out of the check valve.

It was after this that we decided the only remaining thing to do was disassemble the group head and inspect/replace the feed tube. Understandably, I didn't want to do that particular bit of surgery. It was expensive for both Chris and me to send the machine in for service, and the intermittent nature of the problem made it more than likely that a "fix" might be found, only to have the flow rate drop again later. That's why the decision was made to replace the machine. It helped a lot that I was willing to drive 3 hours each way to Albany to switch machines. Hopefully, Chris's people will find a definitive cause of the problem.

erics wrote:In addition to this, there is no information provided by anyone as to how this flushing flowrate is being measured, i.e. are we using stopwatches, laboratory beakers, multiplying a 10 second water debit by 6, etc., etc. Everybody can be using different methods and providing intentionally honest numbers.


I guess there could be significant variation between the measurements provided by various people. However, everyone who reported back to me had a flow rate in the 425-475 ml/min range. Further, and probably more significant, Chris Kramer at Chris Coffee has setup and measured the flow rate on at least 15 GS/3s since I reported my problem to him, and they were all in the 450 ml/min range. Presumably, Chris was using the same measuring equipment and methodology each time, which I'm pretty sure was the same as the method I told him I was using (remove PF, run for max brew limit of 50 seconds, divide resulting milliliters by 50, multiply by 60.)

Perhaps more significant are the variations in flow rate I saw. Since they covered a 120 ml/min range, there's little doubt that something was wrong with the machine. The odd delay in pressure ramp up time (it doubled), which was also intermittent and not strictly correlated with the flow rate variations, indicated a problem as well.

Problem aside, what's the right flow rate? I don't know how to reconcile all the reports of flow rates in the 450 ml/min range with the 325-350 ml/min design spec reported to me by Bill Crossland. Perhaps this is due to a different measurement regimen. Bill told me he was drawing a full liter and keeping track of the time, which is a little different than the way I was doing it. Perhaps LM Florence didn't get Bill's memo or changed the flow rate somewhere along the line? All I know is that there are a lot of GS/3s out there with flow rates in the 450 ml/min range, including my new replacement GS/3, serial number 613 manufactured 09/08. So far, the only GS/3s with flow rates under 400 ml/min that I know of are Bill Crossland's personal GS/3 and the one I took back to Chris Coffee. Oh, and then there's the guy in Australia with a flow rate of 180 ml/min, but that's another story, perhaps due to some very seriously hard water down under.
Dick Green
User avatar
Peppersass
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Location: New Hampshire

Postby CRCasey on Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:24 pm

I guess we will await the final report from Chris's Coffee on this. It seems to be a one of a kind failure. I will be interested in what the final outcome is.

-Cecil
Black as the devil, hot as hell, pure as an angel, sweet as love-CMT:LMWDP#244
User avatar
CRCasey
 
Posts: 676
Joined: Jan 20, 2009
Location: Lewisville, TX

Postby Billc on Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:34 am

Hey all,
The Flow rate issue is a tough one. The GS3 was designed with a 0.6mm flow restrictor. In Lab conditions the flow rate at exactly 9 bar is around 350mL/min.

The variance comes from:
1. the tolerance on the hole diameter in the flow restrictor
2. The variation in accuracy of the pressure gauge.

Any difference in pressure changes flow rate and any change in flow rate changes pressure. Thus the flow rate can vary quite a bit. I would not worry if your machine is at 350m/min. Mine is currently at 370 mL/min. I have also installed a precision laser drilled ruby orifice in mine also.

For those experiencing a change I thought of one other cause. There could be a restriction in the plastic tube that goes from the water reservoir to the pump. And by restriction I mean any type of kinking or collapsing. If those experiencing this problem could watch this hose in the process it might tell something. It could be possible that the pump is causing enough of a low pressure area in the tube that it may be collapsing some and causing a flow restriction to the pump. Could someone relay this to Chris coffee also?

The Fluid-o-Tech pump is spec'ed to be way over the flow rate needed. This is because you have to trade off pressure and flow rate. You can see this if you ever saw a machine that the steam boiler filled while brewing. The flow rate increases and decreases pressure in the line everywhere else.


Bill
Billc
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Jan 15, 2009
Location: Seattle, Washington 98115

Postby EricC on Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:47 pm

I have just checked my GS/3 which is plumbed in and it works out at 390mL/min.

This was not using any lab measuring beakers only an OxO measuring jug.

Regards
Eric
User avatar
EricC
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Mar 06, 2006
Location: Liverpool UK

Postby Peppersass on Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:10 pm

Billc wrote:Hey all,
The Flow rate issue is a tough one. The GS3 was designed with a 0.6mm flow restrictor. In Lab conditions the flow rate at exactly 9 bar is around 350mL/min.

The variance comes from:
1. the tolerance on the hole diameter in the flow restrictor
2. The variation in accuracy of the pressure gauge.


Most respondents to my inquiries reported GS/3 flow rates around 450 ml/min. That's what my replacement GS/3 is running, and about what Chris Coffee has measured on at least 15 GS/3s they've setup. I've heard numbers as high as 480 ml/min and as low as 300 ml/min (the latter being my first GS/3.) But the average seems to be 450 ml/min. I understand that there's a tolerance on the flow restrictor hole diameter and variation in accuracy of the pressure gauge, but isn't a 30%+ difference (350->450) a rather large tolerance range?

Billc wrote:For those experiencing a change I thought of one other cause. There could be a restriction in the plastic tube that goes from the water reservoir to the pump.


I checked for that. This cause was definitively ruled out when I plumbed-in the machine and the 350 ml/min flow rate didn't change.

Speaking of change, it was more the change in flow rate that alarmed me than the low flow rate itself. Mysteriously, the flow rate would bounce up from 360 ml/min to 420 ml/min after various things I did, like change the group solenoid valve, blow out the group feed tube with compressed air, etc. I thought there was a correlation between draining and refilling the brew boiler, but that turned out to be false. Fairly consistently, though, backflushing would cause the flow rate to drop back down from 420 ml/min to 360 ml/min or less.

Does a 17% variation in flow rate make a difference? I don't know. But I do know that the old machine would leave pock marks in the surface of the puck, an indication of channeling, while the new machine doesn't do that. The consistency of the pucks seems different and the surface is quite smooth by comparison to the first machine. This is totally non-intuitive to me, as I would think a higher flow rate would disturb the puck more. It'll be a while before I can determine if this has any effect on taste.
Dick Green
User avatar
Peppersass
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Location: New Hampshire

PreviousNext

Return to Espresso Machines