espresso machines at 1st-line.com

Can someone explain how best to stabilize the grouphead temperature? - Page 2

Postby mitch236 on Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:45 pm

mteahan wrote:The Marzocco manual says you have to run the group after a 30 minute rest to bring it back up to temperature. Saturated groups rely upon circulating water and thermal conductivity of the group material to move heat from one place to another, like from where the temperature is measured to where it is dispensed.

Stainless steel is awful for transferring heat energy, which is why the older non welded Marzoccos were more stable than the new ones.

HX machines tend to rise in temp from non use as the thermosyphon doesn't stall. It is all about balancing temperature profile capabilities of HX designs to match usage. Home use of commercial machines requires an accommodation outside the expected duty cycle of the machine.


So I actually have an inferior machine since my grouphead is welded!! What you say makes sense. I am modifying a blind disk to simulate a shot. That way, I can run two shots with the blind disk and then run my shot. In your experience, does a properly setup PID make the Linea noticeably more temp stable? I'm torn about adding that (and possible the Piero mod as well) to improve shot to shot consistency.
mitch236
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Location: Florida

Postby mteahan on Sat Jul 31, 2010 7:26 pm

I think PID's are sometimes over used. They are designed to maintain temperature under static, predictable heat dissipation environments are to adjust the recovery algorithm after an unexpected temperature change. Not always the perfect solution. Twin boil machines, though, are about the only place where they can make sense.

Not inferior just different.
Michael Teahan
Espresso Part Source
mteahan
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Los Angeles

Postby AndyS on Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:15 pm

mitch236 wrote: I'm torn about adding that (and possible the Piero mod as well) to improve shot to shot consistency.


If you're using a Mazzer Mini, you'll get better results by upgrading your grinder before doing major surgery on the LM.
-AndyS
VST refractometer/filter basket beta tester, no financial interest in the company
User avatar
AndyS
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: NY

Postby mitch236 on Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:28 pm

AndyS wrote:If you're using a Mazzer Mini, you'll get better results by upgrading your grinder before doing major surgery on the LM.


Well, I certainly don't want to spend $3400 for a Robur!!! I can't imagine it would improve my shot consistency enough since I only make one drink a day during the week. All I want to do is improve my single shot consistency. When the machine is in full brew mode, the shots are good. What I have started doing which helps is to run the brew until the boiler light comes on, then I wait for it to go off then I rinse the group for about 10 seconds and go for it. I have been trying to fabricate a "fake" puck that I can just drop into the basket and brew two or three shots and then go but haven't been able to come up with a good solution. I guess I could just brew one throw away shot and then re-brew the same puck again then go. That might work!

Anyway, I appreciate all the input!
mitch236
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Location: Florida

Postby mteahan on Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:24 am

Conicals rock.

I have a small, conical gear reduction drive on demand grinder I got from Spain that makes better espresso than anything else we have in the shop. Funny thing is that our suppliers thought a cheap little thing and can't comprehend why it's still running. Can't get them anymore, but it just plain rocks.

I feel so out of it, everyone has much cooler gear than I do. I am going to have to finish that GS1 just to save face!
Michael Teahan
Espresso Part Source
mteahan
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Los Angeles

Postby AndyS on Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:52 am

mitch236 wrote:Well, I certainly don't want to spend $3400 for a Robur!!!


Well, a Robur is certainly not out of the question for someone who owns a one group Linea. But there are far less expensive approaches. For example: find a used commercial grinder like a Mazzer Major or Super Jolly, pop in a new set of burrs, and enjoy the results.

I won't belabor the point any more, except to say that a Mini mated to a Linea is not a felicitous combination.
-AndyS
VST refractometer/filter basket beta tester, no financial interest in the company
User avatar
AndyS
 
Posts: 1083
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: NY

Postby Arpi on Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:34 am

I think anybody with a good grinder is happy with the machine and feels no urge to upgrade.

I wonder how many people are happy because they upgraded their grinder at the same time they upgraded the machine, attributing the improvement to the machine, good looks, and thickness of the stainless wall enclosure? Do more expensive machines taste better because they are mated to more expensive grinders? Looks like the most limiting factor is the "ugly" grinder parked in the corner.
User avatar
Arpi
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Jan 25, 2009
Location: Baltimore

Postby JonR10 on Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:00 am

mitch236 wrote:Well, I certainly don't want to spend $3400 for a Robur!!!

Compak K10 is less than half that much, it has almost identical burrs and takes well to singledose grinding.
Jon Rosenthal
Houston, Texas
User avatar
JonR10
 
Posts: 876
Joined: May 04, 2005
Location: Houston, TX

Postby mitch236 on Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:16 am

and here I thought I was doing well with my Mini!! Now I'm hunting for a new grinder?

This forum is a dangerous place indeed!!!!!
mitch236
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Jul 21, 2010
Location: Florida

Postby CoffeeOwl on Sun Aug 01, 2010 3:34 pm

Get a KyM Mokka and be happy! You'll make the warming flushes while manually grinding the beans! 8)
:mrgreen:
'a a ha sha sa ma!


LMWDP #199
CoffeeOwl
 
Posts: 1059
Joined: Sep 30, 2007
Location: Lodz Poland

PreviousNext

Return to Espresso Machines