by MontrealScot on Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:51 pm
Hi folks.
I haven't been an espresso geek for a long time, but much like my other hobbies, I tend to get involved from the ground up... so it was natural for me to get involved in roasting, blending, and because I'm not senior VP / partner / wealthy heir, it's also natural for me to do it as reasonably as possible.
I very much understand the fascination with the gear, and can grasp why certain gear would be more suited to certain needs. What I don't understand is why certain coffees may be grouped as "suitable for espresso".
Are the coffees that don't get the rubber stamp are generally... what? Too flavourful? Too weak? Not complex enough or too complex? I've read (and tested it myself) that if you don't like a coffee when it's conventionally brewed, you won't like it in an espresso... and that seems to work for me. But then what about all the fine coffees that get glowing reviews for the flavour in the cup for brewed coffee, but no espresso chop of approval?
One thing that I can say: I'm new enough that I still don't have a holy grail in mind when I'm roasting and blending and tasting my espressos. Each roast with different beans gives a somewhat of a different flavour profile, but they've all been good, and I haven't tired of sampling different varieties.
Should I be brave, then, and step outside the recommendations of the seasoned experts at Sweet Maria's and other companies? Try an XYZ lot from JuanCarlo del Torrrro Finca Muy Magnifico even if somebody with more experience hasn't labeled it as "suitable for espresso"?
I appologize if this comes up all the time... couldn't find anything related to this in the FAQs or searches. Please let me know of any previous threads that would be relevant that I may have missed.
Thanks for any info anybody may care to share,
-Scot