www.chriscoffee.com: quality & service, second to none

My Apologies to Black Cat - Page 3

Postby HB on Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:27 pm

Phaelon56 wrote:When I buy beans week in and week out all year long and my cost is jumping by $3 to $5 per pound because of higher shipping costs - it matters to me and it's completely unrelated to how much I spend on espresso gear or other equipment. Just curious - as long as the topic is under discussion.... what do you folks consider to be realistic shipping costs assuming the beans are comparably priced between different vendors and of comparable quality? (albeit different flavor profiles).

Good question! Hope you don't mind, I've split this to a separate topic What are reasonable shipping costs for roasted coffee?
Dan Kehn
User avatar
HB
 
Posts: 12672
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Location: Cary, NC

Postby Ken Fox on Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:06 am

malachi wrote:
If the coffee is truly 4 months old, then if you find it merely "hum drum" and not in fact "awful and disgusting" than it is truly a special coffee.


Chris,

Hyperbole aside, do you find this to really be true?

I do drink 4 month old coffee from time to time, but only if it was frozen immediately after roasting and kept in a very cold chest freezer. But of course, this is not what we are talking about here.

I have very little experience drinking stale coffee, however the experience that I have is that if the coffee was decent to begin with, e.g. not poor quality over-roasted beans, that after a few weeks it loses all of its defining characteristics and begins to taste like Coffee, N.O.S. (not otherwise specified). Mind you, I don't like coffee, n.o.s., but I don't necessarily find it offensive or disgusting, either. If you ever order coffee out at an unknown bar or restaurant, 4 month old coffee, n.o.s., is about the best you could ever hope to receive. I generally don't order coffee in restaurants, nor do I visit unknown bars except when forced, but I don't think that when well prepared such coffee is either disgusting or, for that matter, undrinkable, even if I'd much rather drink something else.

ken
What, me worry?

Alfred E. Neuman, 1955
Ken Fox
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: Oct 28, 2005
Location: Idaho

Postby another_jim on Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:32 am

malachi wrote:If the coffee is truly 4 months old, then if you find it merely "hum drum" and not in fact "awful and disgusting" than it is truly a special coffee.


This may be worth looking at again; although it's yet another thread hijack.

In Ukers, one year old coffee (used in staling experiments) is described as tasting vaguely like cocoa, not as offensive. It's hard to see how the Folgers, Maxwells, and the Italian bricklayers could get away with doing what they do if it were otherwise.

It could be the offensive aspect of old coffee is oxidized, funky smelling oils on darker roasts. These eventually evaporate.
User avatar
another_jim
 
Posts: 7192
Joined: May 05, 2005
Location: Chicago

Postby portamento on Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:12 pm

To continue the thread hijack in hopes that it will be split...

Counter Culture mistakenly shipped me 8 oz of Grand Reserve (from Aida's farm in El Salvador). It came packed in the tin that was supposed to contain the Finca Mauritania Cascara (dried fruit of the coffee cherry that you steep as tea).

Anyway, this coffee normally sells for $60 / lb. Sadly, when I received it, it had been roasted 1 month ago.

I have to say, I have been brewing this coffee on the Abid Clever and it's a really nice cup, bursting with citrus. Too bad I didn't get to taste it at the peak of freshness, but even at a month old, there are no off-tastes, no unpleasant "staleness" -- yet I'm sure it has lost nuance and sweetness due to age.

Based on this, I believe a great coffee, roasted lightly with no surface oils, can still do okay as a brewed coffee, even outside of the window we call "fresh" around here.

People are quick to condemn coffee as "stale", but this has more to do with the physics of espresso extraction than the coffee itself. 1-month-old coffee isn't necessarily "stale," especially if it has been protected from oxygen in a one-way bag. It just doesn't extract the same way as the 4-10 day old coffees we typically pull shots with.
portamento
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Jan 25, 2008
Location: Texas

Postby timmins on Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:44 pm

wgbennett83 wrote:I've been considering making the trip to Chicago and attending their course. How was it?


Right off the bat I will say that I thoroughly enjoyed the training session. Second, I'm sorry for the delayed response as I didn't see this post till now.

Outside of using an Aeropress and some locally roasted beans, I'm very new to specialty coffee and especially espresso. I found value in the session for just having the ability to pull some shots in front of someone with experience and also the ability to bounce my curious questions. (Todd, the instructor, did say that they offer more intermediate and advanced training sessions.) My class didn't have any WBC contenders so we focused on some of the basics.

The training session had about 5 people in it and was taught by one of Intelligentsia's instructors. I missed the roasting session due to prior engagements and I'm kicking myself because that would have been fascinating not only in terms of roasting but the Black Cat blend, itself. The class covered grinding, tamping, pulling shots, and stretching milk. It took all of the three hours and the hands-on time was worth the price of admission. We used a Nuova WBC machine but they had a Silvia and E61 ready for use. At the end, he showed us a MyPressi that had just been delivered and pulled a shot with it. We left with a freshly roasted bag in hand of Black Cat.

Sorry for my wordy reply... hopefully for posterity's sake, this will help convince someone to take the training session.
timmins
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Oct 31, 2009
Location: Chicagoland

Previous

Return to Coffees