by Heilmittellehre on Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:07 pm
I think part of it may also be our increasing reliance on automation. Having a machine do a job can be a great thing, don't get me wrong, but it takes away some options and some of the learning. For example, my father makes his espresso with a Jura Capresso fully automatic machine. Many of the choices and decisions I have to make with my manual setup were made for him by someone in Switzerland. While he is happy with that, I don't think he can appreciate the full range of espresso possibilities, both good and bad. He also does not know what to do if something were to go wrong with the machine, or if the coffee tasted off. I see this same thing in some cafes. Recently I tried a new place. For whatever reason, the portafilter was leaking in the group head. Because she wasn't trained and was used to pressing a few buttons to make espresso, all she could do was to hold up a bar towel to PF to stem the flow of water and grounds. Needless to say, that was the worst espresso of my life.
A similar process happens with popular novels. I think Stephen King is very honest about what he does. It's all very mechanical and his descriptions of what he does acknowledge the workaday quality of his novels. (FWIW, some of my favorite movies were based on King's novels, most notably the Shining, but also the Shawshank Redemption and the Green Mile).
I'm certainly not suggesting that we chuck all our machines, but I do think that the question of automation is more complex than it might appear.