I'll say "yes," but really that would have me using the same coffees in both grinders and running blind taste tests . . . something I admit I have
not done.
The differences between the two grinders,
for me, are as follows . . .
Mahlkönig K30 Vario: -- grinds a 14.5-15.0 gram double in 3.0-3.3 seconds;
-- is
extremely quiet;
-- has occasional clumping issues, depending upon the weather, BUT the clumps are light and fluffy (as is the rest of the grind), and very easily broken up;
-- larger footprint, but not horrifically so.
Baratza Vario:-- grinds a 14.5-15.0 gram double in 11.0-11.5 seconds (very fast, but having the K30 Vario first, I got used to the 3+ second grind and so the Baratza seems v-e-r-y s-l-o-w by comparison);
-- is
very quiet (but louder than the K30 Vario);
-- has no clumping issues, and the grind is very light and fluffy;
-- small footprint to suit ANY setup/counter space.
Is the
Mahlkönig K30 Vario a better grinder than the
Baratza Vario*? Yes. Is it worth 3x-4x the price? Well, it's not 3x-4x better . . . it's a matter of degrees, not of major leaps and bounds, if you know what I mean. But I'm very glad I own both, and I have absolutely zero desire to upgrade at home . . .
If I ever upgrade my office setup, however, it might be to sell off the CMH and replace it with a Baratza Vario.
Cheers,
Jason
* aka the
Mahlkönig VARIO Home within the EU.