
http://cgi.ebay.com/VINTAGE-FEAR-PEPPIN...2019wt_873
This just concerns me to know that there are a lot of sellers that don't know how or just won't rate a used item's condition correctly. It is also a good warning for auctions that don't have photos, or maybe one poor photo. You would be in for an unpleasant surprise if this one didn't have a photo. He does save his butt with the description and "as-is." In the least, it's annoying when sellers over-hype an item in poor-okay condition just because it's vintage. Since when were conditions relative? This listing is a not so guilty example due to the photo, issues are mentioned, and the price is okay, but you don't know the number of awful condition, no-name box and cast iron hand mills I've seen on ebay and craigslist trying to go in the $100 range just because it's "antique" let alone the countless other used items in "great condition!"
On a side note, this seller has a great feedback rating, although all of his items are listed as EXC, EXC+, EXC++??? Is it just me or does this guy (and a big part of the used sales community) have his abbreviations wrong?



