mb514 wrote:My meaning is that the M3 is a unique and relatively extreme interpretation on the single-dose philosophy. It is however, very appealing in its ultra-direct path, low waste, and aesthetic. What I worry about is that once the honeymoon is over and the setup resumes its workhorse function, will the careful placement of the beans remain charming or a source of frustration?; will I long for the speed that the K10 promises?; will replacement belts remain readily available? While I am asking these questions, does the wide open, front and center, design allow a child to insert a finger into a running grinder?
I have a Vario and an M3 but only a few months experience, but FWIW:
-Careful placement of beans? I just pour them in with a small cup. Is that what you are referring to?
-Speed? It's slow but ok with me. Vario is not much faster. Of course the titans are.
-Belts? Can't say, of course. A possible issue. Mine has been fine but is only a couple of months old.
-Finger? I don't see how. There's a central blocking cone that leaves only a bean sized opening around it.
Vs. Vario: can't say there is much of a taste issue. But the M3 feels like a solid, precise brick and (to me) is a pleasure to look at and touch, while the Vario is a nicely designed conventional appliance that works very well. I found Vario grind setting a little fiddly and not confidence inspiring, though ok. The M3 gives a cleaner pour with less prep, and the grind settings seem precise and repeatable. (I can't compare to a titan since I don't have one.) I will note that my M3 initially required me to do a little tweaking with help from Versalab. It's most suited to types who like elegant if quirky hardware. That having been said, I haven't experienced reliability issues and it's been a pleasure to own.