jmreeves wrote:Anyone else have anything a bit more definitive or share in agreement with Jeff?
On this forum, getting answers to questions usually assumes that you already did some research (and searches on the forums). I leave it to you to tell whether it is the case or not.
I'll assume you already read (from the How-Tos and FAQs):
-
http://www.home-barista.com/espresso-guide-machines.html-
http://www.home-barista.com/hx-love.html-
Why are HX espresso machines so popular?Your questions are many. I'll try to tackle them:
jmreeves wrote:Now obviously the SBDU will have a compromise on either temperature instability(if I steam first) or crema dissipation and lack of latte art(if I brew first).
Correct, except for the latte art part: you won't be able to do latte art if you steam first, as the foam/milk will split appart while you pull your shot.
jmreeves wrote:I am however a patient man for now and would like to know if dissipated crema effects the taste of a milk based drink( I also dont make more than 2 drinks at a time if that).
Take this as the point of view of a non coffee expert, but still from someone who used a Silvia (a SDBU) for 2 1/2 years:
If you do only two drinks and you are patient, I would say that a SDBU could still fit the bill. If you make more drinks than this, you will notice a flatter/bitter taste, while time passes, as the coffee looses its most volatile aromas and gets colder. This said, milk can hide many sins. Hence, doing two milk drinks on a SDBU is more of a convenience issue, IMHO.
jmreeves wrote:I have heard milk based drinks should feature the milk and its microfoam, sweetness, texture etc. My main concern is that I hear from people who upgrade to HX that their worst shot is on par with their best shot from SBDU. Is this more of a consistency/increased barista skill or does the ability to steam and brew at the same time,allowing less crema dissipation effect the taste?
I'm not sure I follow your reasoning. If a shot from a HX is better that one made from a SB, it probably has more to do with the fact that most HX uses the E61 temperature stable group instead of a usually temperature unstable cheaper group on SB. Notice that you
can buy a SB with a E61 group (QuickMill Alexia). HX usually provide more features than first thought: ability to steam/pull shots simultaneously, usually have a E61 group (temperature stability), control over water temperature (by mean of a longer/shorter cooling flush). HX can also usually provide hot water, while it may not be recommended to do so while pulling a shot (to keep the boiling water at a stable temperature during the shot). HX proponents also believe in water being fresher, as the volume of water in the HX tube is renewed a lot quicker than in a bigger volume SB, but to my knowledge this as never beem clearly demonstrated.
jmreeves wrote:I am not looking for machine suggestions but some resolve to this question. I am more of an americano guy but do enjoy milk based drinks on occasion.
You may want to look at HX machines like a Bezzera BZ99 (discontinued?) or BZ07 ($1200) (or BZ10). The latter looks a lot better to me: a promising HX machine, well built, relatively temperature stable and relatively cheap compared to other good HX. Another option would be the Alexia ($1200) (or PIDed Alexia, add ~$300); while it is a really good choice for espresso only, it doesn't have a water tap (if this is where you intend to get you americano hot water from) and it is a SBDU. This QuickMill Silvano ($1000) might also be of interest.
To get more machine recommendations, you will need to specify your budget.