To elaborate on Randy's point...
CZ wrote:He also answered the OP original question rather than to use it as an excuse berate someones machine choice.
Many participants on this forum, including me, have owned the Silvia/Rocky combo. Ten years ago, it had no peer in terms of value/price. Today, it's essentially unchanged over the past decade while others entered the market. For example, after several price increases over the years, Rancilio
still hasn't replaced the stock wide-deadband thermostat with a factory-installed PID similar to those available from their competitors (e.g., Quickmill Silvano, Ascaco Steel Uno, Crossland CC1). In my opinion, there are better choices today than during Silvia/Rocky's heyday.
That said, I certainly understand why some prefer to buy a "known quantity" with a heavily documented history. If a Silvia/Rocky owner later decides to upgrade (as
this poll indicates most will), the resale value is quite good.
Sherman wrote:On topic: Silvia + PID = much better shots. If you already have a Silvia, get the PID and save yourself the headaches.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but the PID improves consistency and convenience, but doesn't raise the Rancilio Silvia's absolute potential. That is, those who have mastered "temperature surfing" will avoid a tedious step that drives some to upgrade, but their espresso potential will be unchanged.