dman777 wrote:In the food industry, looks are just as important as taste. One big reason why I am focusing on looks of the shot. The taste comes after I pull the right shot and it looks good.
A pour that
looks good only confirms there aren't gross errors. Your "focusing on looks" strategy is fine for a newbie, but the sooner you learn to
diagnose problems by taste, the sooner you'll be enjoying better-than-OK espresso.
The goal is great TASTING espresso, not great LOOKING espresso elaborates on this point.
dman777 wrote:I was thinking....with all this money[that would be] invested, would it be better to get the Breville Dual Boiler? I'm still in my return window with the Silvia.
Indirectly
your thread on CoffeeGeek already posed this question (*). Below are excerpts of some of the answers:
Alan Frew wrote:Unfortunately Rancilio management see the domestic consumer market as a convenient source of finance, but not ideas, and are more interested in selling commercial superauto machines than producing a category killer domestic espresso machine. Their disregard for their domestic consumer base has lead to a certain amount of disdain for the Silvia and Rocky with the people who have serious espresso hobbies.
Randy G. wrote:...for the cost of Silvia the home barista is better off spending less on the espresso machine and more on a grinder. Either that, or step up to a HX machine, or the Crossland, or the LeLit, or maybe (after it has shown dependable service and improved customer service) the new Breville 900.
RapidCoffee wrote:In addition to comparably priced machines like the CC1, there are entry-level HX and DB units available for $1000-1200. These offer far greater capabilities than the Silvia for relatively little extra cost.
calblacksmith wrote:PID aside, Silvia is not a bad machine, not at all but NEW, the $/performance ratio is better with other machines.
drgary wrote:So what's the punch line for this thread? Maybe something like Silvia's still well loved but consider your other options for what a Silvia costs.
I recently reviewed the Gaggia New Baby for WIRED magazine (
here). It costs half the Rancilio Silvia and is easier to use, but it's not nearly as well constructed. If you admire the Silvia's looks, value the gigabytes of discussion on the web detailing every [frustrating?] nuance of its use, and are comforted by the good resale value, then it makes sense to keep it. Otherwise, I recommend a lower priced offering (Gaggia) under the assumption that you'll upgrade in a few years, or skip to the next level (heat exchanger or double boiler).
I documented my experience with the Breville in
Quick look at Breville Dual Boiler Espresso Machine. I agree with what other posters on both sites have said: It's easy to use and has a lot of functionality at a surprisingly low price. On the other hand, Breville's new offering hasn't established a track record and there have already been a few hiccups reported online.
(*) There's only one "r" in Home-Barista.com.
