www.barringtoncoffee.com: truly great coffee roasted to highlight its inherent quality

Mazzer Super Jolly vs. Mini E vs. Macap M4

Postby Bob_McBob on Wed Jun 24, 2009 10:53 am

My current setup is an Izzo Duetto and Macap M4 stepless. I can't say I'm horribly unhappy with it or anything like that, but I often read comments about the Super Jolly being quite a step up from the typical M4/Mini setup.

I initially resisted buying a used Super Jolly instead of the M4 because of the hassle of finding one on eBay, trying to get the seller to ship to Canada, ordering new burrs and refurbishing the unit, etc. A typical (US$350 or so) used SJ on eBay would end up costing around C$650-700 after shipping, tax, and buying new burrs, plus the time to fix it up. I could get one new for about C$1020, so I'd probably be inclined to go that route.

I am wondering how much of a difference I might see vs. the M4 in terms of both cup quality and ease of use in dialing in grind settings and such. The stepless adjustment on the M4 is via a worm gear that gives very fine control of the adjustment. Having seen what just a single turn of the worm gear can do to the shot, how easy is it to dial in adjustments with the SJ? From a practical standpoint, what is the minimum height of the SJ with a canning funnel hopper or the smallest hopper Mazzer makes?

I've also been considering the Mazzer Mini E, which I gather has larger burrs like the SJ, but isn't in quite the same class. The only reason this is attractive is because of the amount of coffee I seem to end up wasting by having the clear the grind chute and doser for each of the several espresso sessions I do every day.
Chris
LMWDP #295
Bob_McBob
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
Location: Waterloo, ON Canada

Postby Bob_McBob on Sat Jun 27, 2009 11:29 pm

I don't like to bump threads for attention, but I thought there might be a little more interest in this topic. I've read through the similarly titled grinder comparison threads (and everything I can find on the Super Jolly), but they don't really go into specifics on most of the details I asked about.
Chris
LMWDP #295
Bob_McBob
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
Location: Waterloo, ON Canada

Postby JohnB. on Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:20 am

Hi Bob - I went from the stepless M4 to an SJ & then on to the Majors. The SJ is a noticeable step up from the M4 & I'd definitely recommend the upgrade. Dialing in the grind is very easy on the SJ although micro adjustments aren't as slick as with the M4 worm adjuster. The SJ is much easier to break down for cleaning & with a couple simple doser mods you will have very little waste when changing beans if you grind per shot as I do. If you find a good deal on a Major I'd recommend that even higher as I prefer the power & larger burrs of the Major over the SJ.

Here are some height measurements:

Old Style SJ w/ short Mini hopper = 18.25"
" " " w/no hopper = 13.25"

New Style SJ w/ short Mini hopper = 19.25"
" " " w/no hopper = 14.25"

Major w/no hopper = 15.25"

I used my espresso SJ hopperless & just placed a double basket with a tamper in it in the burr throat when grinding, same as I do with the Major. I find the Major clears the chute better then the SJ but with the velcro mod, a modified upper sweeper spacer & minimal brush work to clear out the chute the doser is pretty much clean after dosing. I'd also consider a plastic version of Andy's Schectermatic a must do mod.
LMWDP 267
User avatar
JohnB.
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Feb 14, 2008
Location: northeastern Ct.

Postby da gino on Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:36 am

I loved my Macap and would not have bought a Super Jolly if I hadn't gotten an SJ for a steal so I could basically break even selling the M4 and buying a like new Super Jolly, but I like the Super Jolly much more. The best shot from each was about the same, but the percentage of great shots definitely went up for me dramatically with the Super Jolly. I think the Pavoni I was using them with was picky and I don't know if the percents would have been the same on another machine. If I started from scratch I'd buy a used, good condition super Jolly as they seem to be the best bargain on the used market, but I don't know if I would buy one new since they are expensive new I might go back with the Macap again if I didn't want to buy used.
da gino
 
Posts: 444
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
Location: Central North Carolina

Postby Bob_McBob on Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:56 am

Thanks for the height measurements, John. The cupboards where I'm living now are really low, to the point that my M4 only just fits underneath without the hopper lid (about 17"). I guess I could probably just get by with a canning funnel on top of the new style SJ, but I move around a lot, so I don't want to let that aspect dictate what I buy.

<eBay rant>
I do like the sound of the Major, but buying one used would be even more of a pain than getting an SJ, since they come up a lot less frequently on eBay. The problem with the eBay grinders is that very few of the sellers actually list shipping to Canada in their auctions, so I have to e-mail every single seller to see if they're willing to ship here. Some aren't, then I eliminate grinders that are in terrible shape/ancient, and there isn't a lot left over. THEN I have to actually bid and win one.

After all that, and paying $85 for shipping, 13% tax, and 2.5% exchange fee on top of the rate, I'm probably more inclined to buy a new SJ for C$1000 all-in vs. paying 30% less for an old grinder I have to clean up and install new burrs.
</eBay rant>

I know this is rather subjective, but in terms of upgrading from the M4, am I better off just buying an SJ, or should I hold out for a Major? It does seem like the Major is the last bastion of sanity before you get into crazy territory. Are there any practical considerations like grind retention?
Chris
LMWDP #295
Bob_McBob
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
Location: Waterloo, ON Canada

Postby jherm77 on Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:04 am

Bob,

Jason/afkitchenkniveguy here...good to see you are into other hobbies outside of knifeforums. I am thinking of getting a SJ to match my mazzer mini. Maybe I could sell a few knives 8)
jherm77
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Nov 20, 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO

Postby zin1953 on Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:13 am

Bob_McBob wrote:It does seem like the Major is the last bastion of sanity before you get into crazy territory.

The advantage to "crazy territory" is that it never seems to the afflicted individual that he or she is crazy -- rather, it's only the rest of the (non-crazy) world who thinks they are, and who's to say who is really the crazy one? (Remember "King of Hearts" with Alan Bates?)

That said, I am somewhat bemused that the Mazzer Major is now the "new black," the "last bastion [grinder] of sanity before you get into crazy territory." I'm still back at thinking that any grinder that's realistically capable of handling the demands of a café is probably excessive for home use. Thus, once you get "above" a Mazzer Mini or a Macap M4, you're already nuts . . . and welcome to the club! (After all, this is from someone who owns a Malhkönig K30 Vario and a Cimbali Max Hybrid -- proof positive I live in "crazy territory"!)

* * * * *

Now, having said all that, I too would move up from the Macap M4 -- not that there is anything wrong with the Macap. The biggest single improvement I ever made to the quality of my espresso in terms of equipment was upgrading from a Mazzer Mini to a Cimbali Max Hybrid. I was amazed that a grinder could make that much difference to what was in the cup! Especially because I thought -- or, at least, others thought -- I was already in "crazy territory" with a Mazzer Mini (then $400+ new). I would presume you would find a similar improvement to your espresso if your Izzo Duetto were paired with an SJ rather than the current M4. (FWIW, the CMH is 17" high with the hopper, cannot be used without it, and is very difficult if not impossible to find one used.)

Cheers,
Jason
A morning without coffee is sleep. -- Anon.
zin1953
 
Posts: 2441
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA USA

Postby Bob_McBob on Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:25 pm

I'm fairly set on upgrading my grinder now, but I'm still having a hard time comparing the Super Jolly to the Major. Obviously the Major is made for even higher output/duty in a cafe setting, which is completely meaningless to me at home. I have read that because the Major ejects grinders at high speed, distribution and clumping are improved, which is obviously a good thing for any user. Also, subjective improvements in cup quality... The height of the Major is a consideration, especially since the new style with interlock apparently doesn't accept the short Mini hopper.

The question is obviously whether the Major is enough of an improvement over the SJ to justify the extra expense to a home user, or simply overkill. There aren't a lot of direct comparisons available, especially since the Major wasn't included in the Titan Ginder Project.

As a matter of value, here are some comparative prices (CAD, including tax/shipping):

Super Jolly (new): $900-1000
Super Jolly (used): $500-700 (lower end of range if I can find a Canadian seller)

Major (new): $1375
Major (used): $800 (possibly plus new burrs)
Chris
LMWDP #295
Bob_McBob
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Jan 21, 2009
Location: Waterloo, ON Canada

Postby Endo on Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:28 pm

Bob,

I live in Canada as well and upgrade last year from a Mazzer Mini to a Mazzer SJ.

I bought new as well for most of the reasons you described. E-bay sounds like a good deal but it can easily turn into a disaster for heavy, expensive gear that must be bought "sight unseen" from someone you don't know and then shipped over the border. Even if everything does arrive intact, once you pay over $400 US on E-bay, you are not saving much over new when you factor in all the other charges and exchange rates.

I bought mine for $750 at the Greenbeanery in Toronto about 6 months ago. It was the last SJ in stock(yes! :D ).

Is it worth upgrading to commerical "Titan" grinder? Probably not. But that hasn't stopped anyone yet.
"Disclaimer: All troll-like comments are my way of discussing"
Endo
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Location: Canada

Postby JmanEspresso on Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:13 pm

I own a major, never owned a superjolly.. I did use one for about 10 minutes. My Major is an older model, its a manual(simple on/off switch), and the cord comes out the bottom, not the side.

The thing(s) I like about the major are
1. Speed... The thing is a demon, roughly 5 seconds for 18grs.
2. 83mm Burrs, as opposed to the 64mm burrs on the SJ.. This puts the major in the "LARGE Planar burr territory". A main advantage of this is LESS day-to-day adjustment of your grind. Less fiddling. I know for fact, if im working with ONE blend/bean, the grind setting stays the same for 2-3 days, and the next needed adjustment is a notch.
3. The exit chute is very easily cleared. I generally need only to Brush, Bump motor, Brush and its clean.
4. Grinds are the definition of "Fluffy", zero clumping.
5. Slighty more room(?) under the doser for a WDT cup.
6. Works well without a hopper, minimal popcorning.(Almost none)
7. Clumping is nill whether you use the doser or not*. My doser is currently off because of a TINY part breaking, and I miss it. Ive got the soda-bottle mod on there.. It works fine, but I miss my doser.

I love my grinder. Its quiet, fast and efficient. It will likely last forever. I have no desire for any other flat-burr grinder. I am considering a conical, but the major will stay with me till I die. And then It will be buried with me.

The super-jolly is a definite step up from the M4. While I think the major is a step up from the SJ, its an exponentially smaller step up. Arguably, the SJ is the turning point for improvement vs. price. To see a PROFOUND difference in the cup, you'll need to spend a lot more then the difference of the SJ/Major.

If you can find a major for roughly the same price as a super jolly, take it, but dont make yourself crazy trying to find a major, a super jolly is a fine piece of equipment. The other grinder i might consider is the cimbali Max Hybrid.. Most everyone loves theirs, and it was comparable to the Kony in the TGP, consistency wise.(I read this, I cant find the post though) Id go for the major if I could find it, because if you ever do upgrade from a superjolly, most likely you'll pass the major and go for a conical.. So why not have the slightly better, faster, larger burr'ed grinder to start with. The size difference is minimal as well.

The Mini-e has the same size burrs as the superjolly, but the cutting surface is different. IIRC, its not the same "3-stage" cutting surface as the SJ, and most others.

As I said, I love my major.
JmanEspresso
 
Posts: 759
Joined: Feb 28, 2009
Location: Westchester-ish New York

Next

Return to Buying Advice