Cameron,
Friendly wrote:I'm hoping for some rationale on how to buy or why to buy, beyond the looks.
Just to restate (what I hope is) the obvious: looks is
not the primary reason to buy a machine. Functionality, capability, and price are all key factors. But there are usually several machines that will fit your requirements in terms of functionality, capability, and price, and at some point, aesthetics
do (IMHO) come into play.
Friendly wrote:I'm having a hard time to find that rationale beyond the Silvia for a SB and the Vivaldi II for a DB . . .
Now you've lost me, since the Silvia and the Vivaldi II are
not interchangeable. The former is a pourover SBDU consumer machine; the latter is a plumbed-in DB prosumer machine. The capabilities of one are not equal -- nor do they even come close -- to the other. So why are you looking at these two? What
exactly do you want from a machine?
Also, I honestly and sincerely believe you are incorrect when you say there is a consensus surrounding the Silvia and the Vivaldi. I do not think that is true
for either machine. I've already discussed -- as has Dan (HB) -- the shortcomings of the Silvia. While it certainly enjoys a large following, one look at the Espresso Machines forum on CG -- as of January 17, 2011 -- shows at least five threads asking for help with their Silvia, or talking about "Silvia woes," and so on.
A lot of people love their Vivaldi II, it's true. And there is a separate forum just for Vivaldi users on the internet. Well, the same is true for the Expobar Brewtus -- a very popular DB with its own user group. Vibiemme Double Domobars? Very popular. Izzo Alex Duetto II? Very popular. So while the Vivaldi II is an excellent machine, and a very popular one, I would personally reject the notion that there is a "universal consensus" that the Vivaldi II is at the top. Indeed, all things being equal --
i.e.: ignoring price -- I don't know of anyone who wouldn't prefer a GS3 to a Vivaldi II.
Friendly wrote: . . . it doesn't seem like there's a peer group that's bought a model or several model's because they've proven themselves to be an outstanding manufacturer/product in the HX market, which is squarely where my budget sits me. that seems to be an anomaly.
IF (and it's a big "if") there is a consensus surrounding a Vivaldi II, then I'd say there's a consensus surrounding the Quick Mill Andreja Premium. But -- again -- I kind of reject the notion to begin with.
Friendly wrote:sure, lots of people prefer Ford over Dodge or visa versa, but there are reviews out there that compare them to one another and site the pro's and con's for the difference and give them grades based on a balanced measure.
And if those reviews were accurate, were they the "universal consensus/gospel truth," no one would buy the pickups that came in second . . . let alone third, fifth, tenth or twenty-fourth!
Friendly wrote:is there anything like that for espresso machines? if so...I seem to have overlooked it.
I would respectfully suggest, Cameron, that a) there are a number of consumer reviews on CG; and b) both here and on CG, there are a number of people who willingly will -- already are! -- giving you advice, opinions, reviews of their own machines, assistance.
Friendly wrote:if it is indeed, they ALL work (like you've mentioned) and it's all based on which one looks/appeals to you the most, then I'll change the way I'm looking for a machine.
OK, let's not miss the FIRST part of what I said . . .
zin1953 wrote:looks is not the primary reason to buy a machine. Functionality, capability, and price are all key factors. But there are usually several machines that will fit your requirements in terms of functionality, capability, and price, and at some point, aesthetics do (IMHO) come into play.
So looks
only come into play
after you've found the machines that otherwise suit your requirements in a machine.
Friendly wrote:I was rather taken by the Bezzera Medea E61. I had hoped that someone would give counter arguments with products that do a better job with the E61 grouphead, or perhaps do just as good a job for a bit less etc etc etc.
so how about this...the E61 grouphead is a tried/tested/true system and is still in a lot of use today. having read what I've read, I've got the confidence it's something I'd buy without regret/concern. with that in mind, does anyone do a particularly outstanding job with the E61 that makes them a better consideration then the rest of the pack?
Cameron, you are correct that the E61 (invented in 1961) is "a tried/tested/true system and is still in a lot of use today." But it is not the "be all to end all," and very few groups are
true E61s. Many of the "E61 groups" in use today are variations -- some proprietary in nature -- on a theme, so to speak, as opposed to the true-to-the-original-patent E61 group.
AND as I've already told you,
here and
here, buying by grouphead isn't the way most people purchase a machine. It's not like ordering the pickup truck with a 6-disc CD changer and a satellite radio, rather than the standard AM/FM and 1 CD player . . .
If you want to read a description of the Bezzera proprietary group versus the Bezzera E61 group, read
this post by Jim Schulman . . . or
this one . . . or
this one. (To point to just three.)
Cheers,
Jason