by Peppersass on Thu Aug 25, 2011 2:11 pm
Listen to what the experts are telling you: the grinder has much more to do with producing great espresso consistently than does the machine.
I started out with a Macap M4, similar to the Mini, and a Silvia. I quickly ditched Silvia and bought a GS/3. The difference was stark, to say the least, but most of it had to do with the forgiveness factor and ease of use. I wouldn't say the GS/3 made better shots, per se, but it allowed me to make better shots more easily and more consistently.
But I still had issues with quality and consistency of the grind. I replace the M4 with a Baratza Vario and there was a dramatic improvement in taste and consistency. The little BV is a great performer for the money. But after a few months I began to feel that I could get more flavor out of the coffees I was drinking, and there was also room for improvement in consistency.
I finally upgraded to a "Titan" grinder, a Compak K10 WBC, and that made a huge and lasting difference to the quality and consistency of my espresso. The grinder pulls more flavor out of the beans, and is rock solid on consistency -- the grind is perfectly repeatable from one shot to the next.
Why is consistency important? There are many variables that can be adjusted when making espresso: the coffee itself, the grind setting, the dose, the temperature, the pressure, the extraction ratio, shot volume, shot time, etc. As you try to dial in a coffee to find the optimum settings for these parameters, the job becomes almost impossible if the grinder can't produce the same result from one shot to the next. Many of the sub-Titan grinders with smaller burrs lack consistency, so when the shot changes you don't know if it was mainly due to bumping the dose by a gram or a change in the grind. That's why a rock-solid and consistent grinder is so important.
Some also feel that larger burr grinders bring out more flavors from the coffee, and that the specific burr configuration can affect taste. The Titan test results suggest that large conical burr grinders bring out a little more acidity or fruitiness, while large flat burr grinders bring out a little more of the caramel and chocolate flavors.
Frankly, I wish I had paid more attention to the experts on HB and invested in a Titan grinder from the get-go. It would have saved me a lot of frustration in learning how to dial in coffees.
I've not used a Duetto II, but I've researched the machine. I think it's a very good value for the money. While HX machines are perfectly reasonable if you learn how to control the brew temperature, personally I prefer the freedom from temperature management offered by double boiler machines. There are a lot of great design features in the Duetto II, and I'm sure it will make a great cup of espresso -- provided you get a high quality grinder.
Yeah, all things considered I think the GS/3 is a better machine. There's really nothing in its price range or below that can compare for temperature stability, forgiveness, ease of use, etc. The build quality is several levels above the Duetto II. The current production GS/3s incorporate solutions to many of the problems we had with earlier machines, though not all of them (e.g., the logic board is still exposed to leaks that may occur inside the machine.)
I think it's something of a budget question. If you have the money to spend, get a Titan grinder and a GS/3. If not, then get a Titan grinder and a Duetto II. You'll be happy either way. But whatever machine you select, get the Titan grinder.
Dick Green