HB wrote:For what it's worth, I have three "titan class" grinders for test purposes, specifically the Compak K10 WBC, Mazzer Robur, and Mazzer Super Jolly. If I had to choose only one, I would pick the K10. To my taste, it performs as well as the Robur, but the K10 is more "home friendly" in terms of size, speed, ergonomics, etc.
Agreed. I traded in the Nino for a K10WBC to single dose, and I've had mine for a few weeks now. It's striking how spectacularly different the 300rpm burr speed is for single dosing vs. 600rpm or whatever the Nino is. I've owned the Robur before, and I didn't even
try single dosing with it till after I sold it to Jon, only to realize that it's also quite good at it and doesn't seem to make a perceptible difference in shot consistency or quality vs. grinding with beans in the hopper. I wish I'd never sold my Robur for that reason, but on the other hand I am very pleased with the K10 as a replacement that was fully funded by the sale of the Nino.
I would strongly emphasize the point that the Robur's 71 mm burrset is
virtually geometrically identical to all the 68 mm burrs I have seen. The difference is the mounting system on the burrs means that the outer burrs from these various sets are all mounted entirely different. So while the burrs are cosmetically different, I'd be willing to bet a LOT on the contention that variations in burr quality (see
above link for that too) from set to set probably outweighs any variation among these different grinders. If there is any systematic difference between them in the cup, I am very sure it's got everything to do with their rotational speeds: The K10 is ~300 rpm, the Robur is ~450-500 rpm, the Nino is ~600 rpm, and I am sure the others fall somewhere in that spectrum.
Now that I've tried the Compak, I really struggle to imagine justifying the purchase of the Robur for home. I got the polished aluminum version, and to me the build quality is very high and the lower weight is quite welcome as well. Of course the Robur is just the absolute finest in terms of having the toughest components, but my guess is the primary practical benefit the home user gets from this is a better workout when moving the grinder: They're both very well made overall. I understand this is an improvement for Compak, as they previously had issues with bad switches and annoying doser lids in their older models.
In terms of single dosing: the Compak's doser is slightly better, with a smoother action on the lever and slightly quieter operation in my experience. However, the Compak does have a
bizarrely designed chute that requires significant modification to make chute sweeping work well, and the Compak also has a weaker 'throw' of coffee out the chute than the Robur on account of its slower burr rotation. The practical upshot of that is that it seems to need a little more bumping to clear the chamber. Not too big a deal for me.