by 1st-line on Wed Sep 22, 2010 6:59 pm
Unfortunately, many consumers do not know the nature of the commercial industry or apply consumer standards into the commercial industry. In a commercial situation, many entrepreneurs (not all) would not even flinch an eye at this as it is common. There is less need for perfection in cosmetics as well. Of course, this is not your fault as a consumer.
Mahlkonig is really set up and geared towards the commercial environment. This is why they are delayed reacting as they really hone their resources to the commercial sector. This is unlike Baratza which is geared more towards the consumer.
I am not sure who your vendor is, but I suggest you work with them on a solution. It is their responsibility as you are their customer. They should not be 'passing the buck' as I see many online retailers do. Then your retailer should work it out with Mahlkonig to meet your solution.
As already advised, you have the option to dispute the charge. However, there are a few little secrets people do not know about here
a) this is a small industry and many know each other and speak to each other. Word can get around publicly about the retailer, but consumers can also be black-marked behind the scenes from future purchases,
b) even if it is no fault of their own, a retailer with many disputes on record can lose their privilege to charge credit cards in the future - this is especially true for the smaller outfits, and
c) a very small secret I learned back in 2004 was that actually credit card banks will keep track of the number of disputes you initiate - a consumer with a higher proportion of disputes are seen as a cost to the bank.
As fair balance to what was already stated, there are also many consumers and commercial entrepreneurs who cheat/squeeze retailers to non-existence or failure. Yes, customer service can be so great that its costs are more than the profits made to exist. So, there is a 2 way street to this conversation.
Also, did anyone ever figure out why so many retailers in so many industries publish very little information about products sold. The main reason is that they do not want to be held accountable for every bullet point description. So, after a retailer knows this, less information becomes available in the long term. The best claim I received about 2 weeks ago via a phone conversation from a customer was that the product we sold him was 'not as advertised' for a description listed on another website for the same exact product. I explained that we were not responsible for errors on other web sites.
Once again, to be fair to your retailer, try to work it out with them directly.
Jim Piccinich
1st-line Equipment, LLC