Marshall wrote:Just to be clear, my post was sarcastic. Words like "fraud" and "crime" should not be thrown around to describe things that could be simple mistakes or honest disagreements over commercial standards. No one here knows enough about this transaction to use those words.
From the original poster's description, this thing went beyond a simple mistake long ago. There should have been NO pushback from either the distributor or the manufacturer, ever.
As someone who's been directly in the retail trade, the only acceptable posture from either the distributor or the manufacturer should have been:
"My God, I have no idea how we shipped you a used machine. Here is the tracking number for a brand-new one that is on its way to you. Please print out the enclosed shipping label and send the used unit back to us, at no charge to you. Please also accept our coupon for a $50 credit on any future purchases from us."
The original poster should not have been placed in this position once (when he was shipped the wrong color unit). Twice is beyond understanding (when he was shipped a used unit as new). Three times crosses the line into criminal (when both the distributor and the manufacturer tried to blame him for their incompetence).