It's a good question . . . I don't have an A3, but rather the volumetric version, a T1. I
love my machine, and I unhesitatingly recommend it . . . but when I bought it new, the retail price was still barely over $3,000. And that's precisely your point: would I pay $4,837 today for a brand new
Elektra Sixties T1 (or $4,513 for an A3)?
I haven't really thought about it. Keep in mind the economy right now is very different than it was when I bought my T1. I probably wouldn't buy
anything right now, unless someone made me a deal I couldn't refuse. So it's a very difficult question to answer. There is no other machine I
desire (other than a
Mirage 2-group from Kees van der Westen), so from a "contentment" aspect, I'm
very contented with my T1. I see no inherent advantage in, for example, Vivaldi II or a DoubleDomo -- though both are fine machines.
I suppose my answer would be "no, I wouldn't buy it now" -- but it has
nothing whatsoever to do with the machine, and everything to do with the sad state of the economy. Were I "pushed" into "having" to buy a brand new espresso machine today, I'd probably buy something less expensive simply because of economic concerns (rather than there being a "better" machine available for less money).
Does that make sense?
Cheers,
Jason